Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals significant challenges with appointment access and telephone communication, which dominate concerns across the file. Securing appointments requires extended effort, with patients reporting lengthy telephone queues, frequent unavailability of lines, and limited availability of slots. Reception experience emerges as a consistent issue, with patients describing interactions as dismissive, unwelcoming, and sometimes lacking courtesy or understanding of their concerns. Medication management problems appear repeatedly, including prescription processing delays and items being removed from patient records without explanation, creating gaps in essential medication supply.

Where clinical care is accessed, feedback is notably more positive, with patients praising professional clinical staff, compassionate care, and reassurance provided during appointments. Several patients specifically commended the quality of clinical assessment and the supportive approach of healthcare professionals. The practice environment is described as clean and well-maintained, and a new telephone callback system has received positive recognition for improving access.

However, the persistent difficulty in reaching the practice and booking appointments, combined with reception staff manner concerns, creates a barrier that prevents many patients from accessing the clinical care they value. Patients report feeling their needs are not prioritised, with some choosing to seek care elsewhere or pursue private consultations due to access frustration. The gap between positive clinical experiences and negative access experiences suggests systemic organisational challenges requiring attention to reception processes and appointment availability.

Appointment

22.56 %
Bad

Reception

28.92 %
Bad

Cleanliness

71.43 %
Great

Care

62.18 %
Average

Respect

32.67 %
Bad

Seen on time

25.89 %
Bad

Filter

BB

Bev B. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Hard to book but worth the wait

It can be challenging to secure an appointment, but once you do manage to see a clinician, the care provided is of good quality. The reception team's approach sometimes feels dismissive, and there appears to be an assumption of medical knowledge that goes beyond their role.

More Info
JD

Jane D. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Felt listened to and treated with care

Had an appointment today and cannot fault the treatment I received. I would also like to mention the lovely trainee who was very professional but also friendly and easy to talk to. Thank you.

More Info
MM

Megan M. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Long wait to get registered as a patient

It took considerably longer than expected to complete the registration process, and I have not yet had the opportunity to be seen by a clinician.

More Info
PC

Peter C. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Struggled to book an appointment with rude staff

Finding it challenging to reach the practice to arrange an appointment. The experience was disappointing, with the reception team coming across as unwelcoming and not particularly supportive.

More Info
JW

Jessica W. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception staff were dismissive and unhelpful

The communication between staff and patients could be improved. The reception team came across as dismissive and unhelpful, without demonstrating much understanding of patient concerns.

More Info
RR

Robbo R. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Receptionist's impatience made me feel unwelcome

The receptionist's manner was dismissive and unkind. When I attended my appointment, I felt judged and rushed, which left me feeling anxious and unsettled. There was a lack of understanding and empathy in how I was treated.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals significant challenges with appointment access and telephone communication, which dominate concerns across the file. Securing appointments requires extended effort, with patients reporting lengthy telephone queues, frequent unavailability of lines, and limited availability of slots. Reception experience emerges as a consistent issue, with patients describing interactions as dismissive, unwelcoming, and sometimes lacking courtesy or understanding of their concerns. Medication management problems appear repeatedly, including prescription processing delays and items being removed from patient records without explanation, creating gaps in essential medication supply.

Where clinical care is accessed, feedback is notably more positive, with patients praising professional clinical staff, compassionate care, and reassurance provided during appointments. Several patients specifically commended the quality of clinical assessment and the supportive approach of healthcare professionals. The practice environment is described as clean and well-maintained, and a new telephone callback system has received positive recognition for improving access.

However, the persistent difficulty in reaching the practice and booking appointments, combined with reception staff manner concerns, creates a barrier that prevents many patients from accessing the clinical care they value. Patients report feeling their needs are not prioritised, with some choosing to seek care elsewhere or pursue private consultations due to access frustration. The gap between positive clinical experiences and negative access experiences suggests systemic organisational challenges requiring attention to reception processes and appointment availability.

Appointment

22.56 %
Bad

Reception

28.92 %
Bad

Cleanliness

71.43 %
Great

Care

62.18 %
Average

Respect

32.67 %
Bad

Seen on time

25.89 %
Bad
Filter

Order By

Rating