Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a practice with significant challenges in access and communication, alongside pockets of strong clinical care. Appointment availability remains the most consistent concern, with patients reporting difficulty reaching the practice by telephone, lengthy waiting times for callbacks, and extended delays in securing appointments. Reception experience is notably inconsistent, with some patients describing helpful and welcoming interactions whilst others encountered dismissive or unwelcoming staff. Administrative responsiveness, including prescription processing and correspondence turnaround, frequently falls short of acceptable standards, with patients experiencing delays spanning weeks.

Clinical care delivery shows considerable variation. Whilst some patients praise the professionalism, attentiveness and genuine care demonstrated by certain clinicians and nursing staff, others report inadequate follow-up, inconsistent guidance across different practitioners, and concerns about responsiveness to serious health matters. Prescription processing efficiency is generally positive when functioning, though access to the prescription line itself presents barriers. The practice environment is described as clean and well-maintained, and some patients acknowledge management's responsiveness when concerns are escalated.

Patterns suggest the practice has experienced service quality decline over time, with long-standing patients noting deterioration from previously higher standards. Systemic pressures including staffing levels and outdated technology infrastructure are acknowledged as contributing factors. Patients express frustration that appointment access challenges persist despite these explanations, and note the emphasis on digital self-service options has not resolved underlying accessibility issues.

Appointment

32.67 %
Bad

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

62.18 %
Average

Respect

42.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.42 %
Poor

Filter

HR

Helen R. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Felt truly listened to and cared for

The medical professionals at this practice are exceptionally dedicated and go the extra mile. In particular, two of the clinicians stand out as exemplary practitioners who embody the highest standards of what healthcare should be. They are first-rate and truly outstanding.

More Info
AA

Anthony A. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception staff could improve their phone manner

The receptionist's demeanor was quite poor and rather abrupt. They were not particularly helpful, and it would be beneficial if the reception team received training in telephone communication skills.

More Info
HA

Hannah A. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Great!

Friendly staff and quick prescription turnaround

I have been a patient here for around 6 years and have found little to complain about. The practice has consistently provided good care for both myself and my family member. Like many surgeries, obtaining face-to-face appointments can be challenging, though they do provide telephone consultations as an alternative, with the option to arrange an in-person visit afterwards if needed. My main concern is that some team members could benefit from greater awareness regarding mental health conditions, though I recognise this is an issue across many healthcare settings. The premises are clean and well-kept, and the staff demonstrate friendliness and a willingness to help. Prescriptions are typically prepared and ready for collection within two days of being requested.

More Info
PH

Peter H. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Struggling to get appointments when needed

I have been a patient at this practice for a considerable time. Unfortunately, the quality of service has declined from what it once was. Getting through to speak with someone or securing an appointment at a time of need has become increasingly difficult. The practice continues to cite external circumstances as reasons for these challenges, though this explanation has worn thin. There is a strong emphasis on self-service digital options. It is hoped that the upcoming new facility will provide a better standard of care.

More Info
RB

Rose B. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Great!

Staff were helpful despite the busy surgery

The practice was quite hectic, though the team members were extremely accommodating and supportive.

More Info
NQ

Ngoc Q. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Impossible to book an appointment by phone

The experience was quite frustrating. I attempted to book an appointment following the requested call time, but was unable to get through despite multiple attempts. When I finally did make contact, I was unable to secure an appointment for several weeks, which was disappointing given my need for timely care.

More Info
MM

Mahdi M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Long phone queues and slow administrative responses

Waiting times on the telephone are frequently lengthy, often extending to half an hour or more. The practice attributes this to current pressures, though I observed similar delays occurring prior to these circumstances as well. The turnaround for administrative tasks such as email responses, prescription processing, referrals, and correspondence falls short of acceptable standards. When requesting a straightforward letter, I needed to follow up multiple times over several weeks, only to receive a document containing inaccuracies. Upon raising concerns about this, I encountered an unhelpful response. Subsequently, I escalated the matter to management and endured a further three-week delay before obtaining the letter I had requested and paid for. Administrative processes are also problematic, though this reflects broader systemic issues rather than being unique to this practice. The wider healthcare system appears to struggle with efficiency in this regard. The clinical expertise available is inconsistent and sometimes lacking. However, I recognise this may be a wider concern across the sector rather than isolated to this surgery. The healthcare system generally appears to face challenges in consistently delivering high-quality clinical care, and finding practitioners of exceptional standard can be difficult. Additionally, the reception staff are not consistently courteous. Some interactions have been notably unpleasant and confrontational.

More Info
GH

Geoff H. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Friendly doctors let down by chaotic reception

The clinical staff were friendly and professional, however the reception team seemed disorganised, lacked responsiveness and appeared dismissive. The practice was previously of a higher standard.

More Info
OL

Ophelia L. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Great!

Couldn't book online, but staff were helpful

The practice recommended my child receive the flu vaccination. The website indicated we needed to call to arrange an appointment, but we were unsuccessful in getting through initially. Eventually, we managed to secure a booking, and the team were very pleasant and helpful.

More Info
JM

Julie M. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Friendly reception staff made the visit pleasant

Outstanding quality of care and service provided at this practice.

More Info
AB

Abou B. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Front desk lacks privacy for sensitive conversations

The reception staff and nursing team are excellent, however there is virtually no privacy at the front desk. I would caution against raising mental health matters or concerns about alcohol consumption at this practice. Following a significant personal loss, I sought support and discussed my struggles with a clinician who misunderstood the situation and believed I was unfit to drive, despite this not being the case. This led to a report being made to the relevant authority, resulting in the suspension of my driving privileges for three years and subsequent job loss in my industry, as my employer considered me unsuitable for safety-sensitive work. However, one particular clinician has been exemplary in their approach, demonstrating genuine care and attentiveness to patient wellbeing, and I am grateful for their professionalism and the support provided by the wider team.

More Info
EW

Elaine W. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Long-term patient finds staff consistently friendly and helpful

I have been a patient at this practice for a considerable time and have consistently experienced helpful, accommodating, friendly and courteous service.

More Info
JW

Julie W. Google 9 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Receptionist unhelpful about urgent eye drop prescription

The practice was not particularly helpful when I needed to obtain eye drops following surgery. My elderly disabled father was about to run out of his antibiotic eye drops, and when I contacted the surgery to request them, the receptionist suggested I contact the pharmacy instead. I was informed that a repeat prescription would take 48 hours to process, which would have left my father without his medication for several days after his operation. This would have meant either taking him to an urgent care centre after work or him going without the drops during his recovery period. I was quite dissatisfied with how this situation was handled.

More Info
LS

Leonard S. Google 10 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Felt genuinely listened to and cared for

I have consistently received good care throughout my visits.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a practice with significant challenges in access and communication, alongside pockets of strong clinical care. Appointment availability remains the most consistent concern, with patients reporting difficulty reaching the practice by telephone, lengthy waiting times for callbacks, and extended delays in securing appointments. Reception experience is notably inconsistent, with some patients describing helpful and welcoming interactions whilst others encountered dismissive or unwelcoming staff. Administrative responsiveness, including prescription processing and correspondence turnaround, frequently falls short of acceptable standards, with patients experiencing delays spanning weeks.

Clinical care delivery shows considerable variation. Whilst some patients praise the professionalism, attentiveness and genuine care demonstrated by certain clinicians and nursing staff, others report inadequate follow-up, inconsistent guidance across different practitioners, and concerns about responsiveness to serious health matters. Prescription processing efficiency is generally positive when functioning, though access to the prescription line itself presents barriers. The practice environment is described as clean and well-maintained, and some patients acknowledge management's responsiveness when concerns are escalated.

Patterns suggest the practice has experienced service quality decline over time, with long-standing patients noting deterioration from previously higher standards. Systemic pressures including staffing levels and outdated technology infrastructure are acknowledged as contributing factors. Patients express frustration that appointment access challenges persist despite these explanations, and note the emphasis on digital self-service options has not resolved underlying accessibility issues.

Appointment

32.67 %
Bad

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

62.18 %
Average

Respect

42.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.42 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating