Feedback on this practice reveals a deeply divided patient experience with significant concerns about fundamental service delivery. Patients consistently report severe difficulties reaching the practice by telephone, with many describing perpetually busy lines, unanswered calls, and extended hold times that have forced them to visit in person for basic appointment booking. Communication barriers extend to consultation quality, with complaints about rushed phone appointments lasting only minutes, delayed in-person visits, and unresponsive follow-up from clinical staff. Reception experience is polarised, with some patients praising courteous and supportive staff, whilst others describe condescending and unprofessional behaviour that left them feeling disrespected.
Clinical care concerns feature prominently across multiple reviews, including allegations of rushed consultations, disregard for patient symptoms, diagnostic errors, and reluctance to provide in-person assessments. Several patients report loss of confidence in the practice's medical approach and have sought alternative providers. Administrative issues are also evident, including delayed correspondence, medication ordering errors, and failure to process referrals. A minority of reviews highlight positive experiences, noting compassionate team members, helpful appointment booking, and excellent minor procedures, though these are substantially outweighed by negative feedback.
While some patients acknowledge recent improvements in telephone accessibility and report responsive, supportive reception staff, the overall pattern suggests systemic challenges in appointment access, communication responsiveness, and care quality that have prompted multiple patients to switch providers or escalate concerns through formal complaints channels.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Respond to patient reviews
Monitor satisfaction trends
Generate CQC evidence reports
Claim & Manage ProfileShows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.
Feedback on this practice reveals a deeply divided patient experience with significant concerns about fundamental service delivery. Patients consistently report severe difficulties reaching the practice by telephone, with many describing perpetually busy lines, unanswered calls, and extended hold times that have forced them to visit in person for basic appointment booking. Communication barriers extend to consultation quality, with complaints about rushed phone appointments lasting only minutes, delayed in-person visits, and unresponsive follow-up from clinical staff. Reception experience is polarised, with some patients praising courteous and supportive staff, whilst others describe condescending and unprofessional behaviour that left them feeling disrespected.
Clinical care concerns feature prominently across multiple reviews, including allegations of rushed consultations, disregard for patient symptoms, diagnostic errors, and reluctance to provide in-person assessments. Several patients report loss of confidence in the practice's medical approach and have sought alternative providers. Administrative issues are also evident, including delayed correspondence, medication ordering errors, and failure to process referrals. A minority of reviews highlight positive experiences, noting compassionate team members, helpful appointment booking, and excellent minor procedures, though these are substantially outweighed by negative feedback.
While some patients acknowledge recent improvements in telephone accessibility and report responsive, supportive reception staff, the overall pattern suggests systemic challenges in appointment access, communication responsiveness, and care quality that have prompted multiple patients to switch providers or escalate concerns through formal complaints channels.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Filter
Claire N.
8 years ago
Bad!
Worst customer service nightmare ever
Extremely difficult to reach or communicate with