Patient Experience Summary

Feedback on this practice reveals a deeply divided patient experience, with appointment access emerging as the most consistent concern across reviews. Securing routine consultations typically requires booking weeks in advance, with many patients reporting waits of two to three weeks or longer. The morning telephone booking system generates particular frustration, with patients describing lengthy queues and frequent unavailability of slots. Emergency appointment access, by contrast, receives consistent praise for responsiveness and accessibility. Care quality from physicians is frequently commended, with patients highlighting professional expertise, attentive listening, and thorough diagnostic approaches. However, reception experience presents a stark contrast to clinical care, with multiple reviews citing discourteous staff conduct, unprofessional attitudes, and communication failures that undermine confidence in the service.

Patients report significant variation in their interactions with reception staff, with some describing warmth and helpfulness whilst others experienced dismissiveness and hostility. Waiting times beyond scheduled appointments are commonly mentioned, though some patients acknowledge this reflects thorough clinical attention. The practice environment has been criticized in isolated reviews for cleanliness concerns. Communication breakdowns appear in several accounts, including missed referral follow-ups, incorrect information provision, and inadequate responsiveness to patient concerns. A minority of reviews raise serious concerns about medication management and clinical decision-making, though these represent individual experiences rather than systematic patterns.

For patients who have experienced positive interactions, particularly those with long-standing relationships with the practice, satisfaction centers on continuity of care, compassionate treatment, and professional competence. The disparity between positive and negative feedback suggests that experience varies significantly depending on appointment type, reception staff encountered, and individual clinical circumstances. Appointment availability and reception courtesy represent the primary areas where patient satisfaction diverges most sharply from clinical care quality.

Appointment

32.50 %
Bad

Reception

38.75 %
Poor

Cleanliness

45.00 %
Poor

Care

62.25 %
Average

Respect

42.00 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.75 %
Poor

Filter

DB

David B. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Lifelong care from amazing medical professionals

Outstanding medical professionals and personnel. I've been a patient at this practice for over five decades. Dr. Watton rescued me from life-threatening infantile croup in 1966, and Dr. Harte performed a critical intervention for an aortic aneurysm in 2018, effectively preserving my life on two separate occasions.

More Info
EN

Ea N. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Frustrating delays in booking medical appointments

ENDLESS WAIT TO SEE A DOCTOR Every time you attempt to schedule a consultation, you're inevitably looking at a delay of 10 to 14 days. When this prolonged waiting period is brought up with the medical staff or physician, they consistently display feigned surprise, as if the scheduling backlog is completely unknown to them—or perhaps they're deliberately avoiding acknowledging the underlying problems.

More Info
BW

Brian W. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Great!

Speedy service but grumpy doctor ruins experience

Secured a consultation without much delay. Unfortunately, one of the physicians has an incredibly unpleasant demeanor

More Info
HC

Hannah C. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Exceptional healthcare with caring and attentive staff

Churchview is an exceptional medical practice. The front desk staff consistently demonstrate remarkable helpfulness and go above and beyond to assist patients. The doctors are incredibly attentive and provide comprehensive care with utmost dedication. The urgent appointment arrangements are particularly impressive, which is a lifeline for parents of children with health vulnerabilities who can suddenly become unwell. Precisely the kind of healthcare facility one hopes to find.

More Info
MB

Mark B. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Terrible service and negligent medical care

This medical practice and its so-called physicians (who should be helping patients obtain necessary medications) are absolutely the most terrible healthcare facility I've ever unfortunately encountered. The medical staff display an incredibly poor demeanor and consistently make patients feel like an inconvenience simply by seeking treatment. I am definitely planning to initiate a formal complaint process and escalate my experience with this surgery to a higher level, especially considering I have been hospitalized as a direct result of their negligence.

More Info
NY

Nabeel Y. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Great!

Amazing medical care with top-notch professionals

Dr. Docter's surgical procedure was truly top-notch. The medical team and staff provided exceptional care and service throughout my experience.

More Info
AF

Amy F. Google 9 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Frustrating wait times for medical appointments

Getting a medical appointment requires scheduling weeks ahead, making it challenging to receive timely healthcare services.

More Info
AR

Alex R. Google 10 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Exceptional healthcare with compassionate and caring professionals

These physicians are undoubtedly top-tier professionals. Their ability to accommodate emergency appointments on short notice is truly impressive. Every member of their medical team - from doctors to nurses to administrative staff - has been incredibly supportive and helpful to our family. While you might experience some waiting time beyond your scheduled appointment, it's because they are meticulous in their care. Non-urgent appointments could have longer wait times, but rest assured you'll eventually see your healthcare provider. Having worked temporarily in the US, we've gained perspective on how fortunate we are to avoid the hefty upfront costs of healthcare, where simply entering a medical facility can cost £100 before even consulting a doctor.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01384 566929
  • Church View Surgery 239 Halesowen Road Cradley Heath, Warley West Midlands B64 6JE

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback on this practice reveals a deeply divided patient experience, with appointment access emerging as the most consistent concern across reviews. Securing routine consultations typically requires booking weeks in advance, with many patients reporting waits of two to three weeks or longer. The morning telephone booking system generates particular frustration, with patients describing lengthy queues and frequent unavailability of slots. Emergency appointment access, by contrast, receives consistent praise for responsiveness and accessibility. Care quality from physicians is frequently commended, with patients highlighting professional expertise, attentive listening, and thorough diagnostic approaches. However, reception experience presents a stark contrast to clinical care, with multiple reviews citing discourteous staff conduct, unprofessional attitudes, and communication failures that undermine confidence in the service.

Patients report significant variation in their interactions with reception staff, with some describing warmth and helpfulness whilst others experienced dismissiveness and hostility. Waiting times beyond scheduled appointments are commonly mentioned, though some patients acknowledge this reflects thorough clinical attention. The practice environment has been criticized in isolated reviews for cleanliness concerns. Communication breakdowns appear in several accounts, including missed referral follow-ups, incorrect information provision, and inadequate responsiveness to patient concerns. A minority of reviews raise serious concerns about medication management and clinical decision-making, though these represent individual experiences rather than systematic patterns.

For patients who have experienced positive interactions, particularly those with long-standing relationships with the practice, satisfaction centers on continuity of care, compassionate treatment, and professional competence. The disparity between positive and negative feedback suggests that experience varies significantly depending on appointment type, reception staff encountered, and individual clinical circumstances. Appointment availability and reception courtesy represent the primary areas where patient satisfaction diverges most sharply from clinical care quality.

Appointment

32.50 %
Bad

Reception

38.75 %
Poor

Cleanliness

45.00 %
Poor

Care

62.25 %
Average

Respect

42.00 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.75 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating