Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reveals a deeply polarised experience with significant inconsistency across service areas. The medical team consistently receives praise for compassion, clinical competence, and supportive care, with patients frequently highlighting prompt consultations and effective treatment. However, reception experience presents a stark contrast, with widespread complaints about dismissive communication, rudeness, and lack of courtesy during phone and in-person interactions. Appointment access remains a critical issue, with patients reporting difficulty securing timely slots, misleading walk-in centre claims, and administrative failures in booking systems and callback promises. Several reviews highlight concerning gaps between service quality and patient expectations, particularly around responsiveness to inquiries, communication clarity, and follow-up care. While some patients describe efficient, welcoming experiences with minimal waiting times, others report lengthy delays, unresponsive staff, and organisational confusion that undermines confidence in the service.

The facility's marketing as a walk-in centre appears inconsistent with operational reality, generating frustration among patients seeking urgent care. Communication breakdowns between reception and clinical teams, combined with inconsistent application of policies, suggest underlying organisational challenges. Positive experiences tend to correlate with individual staff members demonstrating initiative and empathy, whereas negative experiences reflect systemic issues around appointment availability, reception courtesy, and administrative coordination. The contrast between the quality of clinical care and the reception experience suggests that service improvements would benefit from focused attention to staff training, communication protocols, and appointment management systems.

Appointment

35.20 %
Poor

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

58.30 %
Average

Respect

36.80 %
Poor

Seen on time

48.65 %
Poor

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 0161 8396227
  • City Health Centre 2Nd Fl, 32 Market St Manchester Lancashire M1 1PL

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reveals a deeply polarised experience with significant inconsistency across service areas. The medical team consistently receives praise for compassion, clinical competence, and supportive care, with patients frequently highlighting prompt consultations and effective treatment. However, reception experience presents a stark contrast, with widespread complaints about dismissive communication, rudeness, and lack of courtesy during phone and in-person interactions. Appointment access remains a critical issue, with patients reporting difficulty securing timely slots, misleading walk-in centre claims, and administrative failures in booking systems and callback promises. Several reviews highlight concerning gaps between service quality and patient expectations, particularly around responsiveness to inquiries, communication clarity, and follow-up care. While some patients describe efficient, welcoming experiences with minimal waiting times, others report lengthy delays, unresponsive staff, and organisational confusion that undermines confidence in the service.

The facility's marketing as a walk-in centre appears inconsistent with operational reality, generating frustration among patients seeking urgent care. Communication breakdowns between reception and clinical teams, combined with inconsistent application of policies, suggest underlying organisational challenges. Positive experiences tend to correlate with individual staff members demonstrating initiative and empathy, whereas negative experiences reflect systemic issues around appointment availability, reception courtesy, and administrative coordination. The contrast between the quality of clinical care and the reception experience suggests that service improvements would benefit from focused attention to staff training, communication protocols, and appointment management systems.

Appointment

35.20 %
Poor

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

58.30 %
Average

Respect

36.80 %
Poor

Seen on time

48.65 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating