Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience with significant challenges in appointment access and telephone responsiveness, alongside notable strengths in clinical care delivery. Difficulty reaching the practice by phone and securing timely appointments emerges as the most consistent concern, with patients reporting prolonged wait times, unanswered calls, and limited availability. Reception staff interactions are described variably, ranging from courteous and helpful to dismissive and unhelpful, suggesting inconsistency in service quality. When patients do access clinical care, feedback is predominantly positive, with clinicians frequently praised for thoroughness, compassion, and professional expertise. The practice demonstrates particular strength in emergency response and specialist referral processes. However, concerns about prescription processing delays, limited online consultation support, and administrative responsiveness persist across multiple reviews. Several patients acknowledge the practice operates under considerable demand with resource constraints, though others feel these challenges do not excuse service shortcomings. The facility itself is well-maintained and welcoming, with convenient parking and accessible location noted positively.

Key service improvement areas centre on telephone infrastructure and staffing, appointment availability systems, and consistency in reception experience. While clinical outcomes and care quality receive consistent praise, the accessibility barriers and administrative processes create frustration that deters some patients from seeking care. Positive experiences often correlate with direct clinical contact, whereas negative experiences typically involve booking processes, reception interactions, or delayed administrative responses.

Appointment

38.94 %
Poor

Reception

42.18 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.15 %
Great

Care

58.76 %
Average

Respect

48.52 %
Poor

Seen on time

45.67 %
Poor

Filter

GW

Gus W. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Quick emergency appointment when I needed it most

During a brief visit to the Isle of Wight in the Cowes area, I experienced a respiratory emergency and realised I had forgotten to bring my necessary medication with me. I rang the local health centre and was offered an urgent same-day appointment at short notice on a Friday evening. Upon arrival at the surgery, I was attended to promptly within a quarter of an hour and received treatment using a nebuliser device. The team demonstrated considerable compassion and understanding given the circumstances of my situation. The clinician I consulted proved to be very thorough and efficient, issuing prescriptions for anti-inflammatory medication and antibiotics to address my chest symptoms. Overall, the experience was handled in a professional and streamlined manner. I am grateful for the care provided.

More Info
CS

Callum S. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Impossible to reach by phone for appointments

The practice is difficult to reach by telephone despite multiple attempts to contact them. It has been challenging to secure an appointment through this method, which makes accessing their services problematic.

More Info
AS

Anthony S. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Frequent cancellations causing long appointment gaps

The orthodontic appointment scheduling has been problematic, with frequent cancellations occurring. The gaps between consecutive appointments have extended to 14-18 weeks, which is considerably longer than the typically recommended interval of 4-10 weeks.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience with significant challenges in appointment access and telephone responsiveness, alongside notable strengths in clinical care delivery. Difficulty reaching the practice by phone and securing timely appointments emerges as the most consistent concern, with patients reporting prolonged wait times, unanswered calls, and limited availability. Reception staff interactions are described variably, ranging from courteous and helpful to dismissive and unhelpful, suggesting inconsistency in service quality. When patients do access clinical care, feedback is predominantly positive, with clinicians frequently praised for thoroughness, compassion, and professional expertise. The practice demonstrates particular strength in emergency response and specialist referral processes. However, concerns about prescription processing delays, limited online consultation support, and administrative responsiveness persist across multiple reviews. Several patients acknowledge the practice operates under considerable demand with resource constraints, though others feel these challenges do not excuse service shortcomings. The facility itself is well-maintained and welcoming, with convenient parking and accessible location noted positively.

Key service improvement areas centre on telephone infrastructure and staffing, appointment availability systems, and consistency in reception experience. While clinical outcomes and care quality receive consistent praise, the accessibility barriers and administrative processes create frustration that deters some patients from seeking care. Positive experiences often correlate with direct clinical contact, whereas negative experiences typically involve booking processes, reception interactions, or delayed administrative responses.

Appointment

38.94 %
Poor

Reception

42.18 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.15 %
Great

Care

58.76 %
Average

Respect

48.52 %
Poor

Seen on time

45.67 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating