Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience with significant variation in service quality across different areas of the practice. Telephone access remains a persistent challenge, with many patients reporting difficulty reaching the practice by phone, extended wait times on hold, and instances of connectivity issues. Reception experience is inconsistent, ranging from courteous and helpful interactions to dismissive and discourteous behaviour that has left some patients feeling unwelcome. Appointment availability and booking processes present ongoing concerns, with patients experiencing long waiting times before being seen, difficulties securing in-person consultations, and challenges navigating the appointment system, particularly for those with inflexible work schedules.

On a positive note, clinical staff are frequently described as professional and competent, with many patients appreciating the welcoming environment and accessible facilities. Several patients have experienced responsive care and continuity with established clinicians, and the practice's digital booking system has been praised for efficiency. However, concerns about follow-up communication and inadequate responsiveness to patient needs appear across multiple reviews, with some patients reporting insufficient follow-up after test results and delayed callback communications.

Organisational issues appear to underpin many service challenges, including disorganisation, poor communication between clinical staff, and limited information sharing with patients. While individual team members often demonstrate helpfulness and courtesy, systemic problems with appointment access, telephone responsiveness, and care coordination suggest the practice would benefit from addressing these operational and administrative aspects to improve overall patient experience.

Appointment

45.23 %
Poor

Reception

48.76 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.15 %
Great

Care

56.89 %
Average

Respect

51.42 %
Average

Seen on time

48.65 %
Poor

Filter

JR

Juliet R. Google one year ago

Rating

Average!

Long waits and poor communication between staff members

I'm awarding 3 stars as most team members appear committed to delivering quality care, however the practice's overall management and coordination is problematic, characterised by lengthy appointment delays, insufficient communication between clinical staff, minimal patient information sharing, and concerning issues receiving inadequate priority. This has left me with limited confidence that my healthcare requirements are being properly addressed. The difficulties seem to stem from organisational and administrative issues rather than individual staff performance. There is considerable scope for improvement across the service.

More Info
JD

Jacqui D. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Struggling to reach the practice by phone

I have experienced difficulty reaching the practice by phone.

More Info
LS

Linda S. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Receptionists made all the difference to my care

I am concerned about the impact on my health from what I experienced as exceptionally discourteous reception staff. I felt that not being listened to and messages not being conveyed accurately created a worrying situation. Day 2: an update - I called back and received a markedly different experience with a receptionist who was genuinely helpful, kind and considerate. My issue was resolved immediately. I regret not noting this person's name as they would have deserved top marks. Due to this positive interaction, I have reconsidered my initial assessment and upgraded my rating accordingly.

More Info
LM

Linda M. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception blocked access to in-person care

I found the service disappointing. As an older patient, I felt the receptionist lacked understanding of my needs when I attended. I experience some health concerns that affect my mobility and wellbeing, and I struggled to get past the reception desk. While an over-the-phone appointment was offered, I was concerned about how certain clinical assessments could be properly conducted remotely rather than in person.

More Info
KW

Karen W. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Hard to reach reception and often see nurses instead

Getting through to the practice can be challenging, and once you do, you need to explain your situation to reception staff who are described as trained. However, appointments often result in seeing a nurse practitioner rather than a doctor, and I found it difficult to get a clear understanding of what was causing my symptoms. I experienced muscle pain related to my fibromyalgia, which I deal with regularly, but when I attended A&E, I spent a considerable amount of time there before being informed about a kidney stone. I was advised to get in touch if the situation changed, though it was reassuring that the hospital could investigate further. My granddaughter had a similar experience where she was seen by multiple clinicians with no clear findings, but when she attended hospital, it became apparent she required urgent attention due to a serious health concern. She was found to have an infection, which was frightening for her family, though she is now recovering well.

More Info
BF

Bradley F. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Phone lines constantly busy and unreachable

The phone lines appear to be unavailable, as I experienced an extended wait of several hours without getting through.

More Info
BB

Bodger B. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Years of feeling completely ignored here

I have found the level of care and attention at this practice to be severely lacking over an extended period of time.

More Info
VB

Victoria B. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Average!

Reception staff could be more respectful

I have received a very good standard of care from this practice and have very few concerns to raise. The reduction of 2 stars reflects my experience with one team member whose communication style I found somewhat condescending.

More Info
MM

Melissa M. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Repeated test results ignored despite hospital concerns

I'm 39 weeks pregnant and had a negative experience with this medical practice. My test results repeatedly indicated a urinary tract infection, and I was advised that antibiotics were necessary. Although samples were sent for analysis, each time the clinician at the practice documented my sample as requiring no further action. On my online records, my samples are marked as "abnormal, no further action required," which I feel is an inadequate way to manage care for someone in late pregnancy. My hospital consultant also indicated that antibiotics were needed and sent a sample for testing, yet the practice here recorded it as not requiring treatment. This pattern continued over several weeks, and the infection progressed to my kidneys. I attended the labour ward at hospital two days ago after spending the night in severe pain, and the ward staff expressed concern that I shouldn't be experiencing such constant discomfort. When they tested my urine, they were alarmed at the level of abnormality present. I experienced chills despite being in a warm environment and had significant pain in my right kidney. I was immediately started on antibiotics, and another sample was sent for analysis by my GP practice, which again was marked as abnormal but no action required. This has occurred repeatedly over weeks. Had I received appropriate support earlier, I believe this serious infection would not have been allowed to develop into a kidney infection. I'm scheduled for induction next Wednesday and I'm feeling quite unwell. I'm disappointed with how my care was handled and concerned about whether there may be lasting damage to my kidney.

More Info
JJ

Joanne J. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Staff were helpful and really listened

Outstanding care and service. Every member of the team demonstrated helpfulness, courtesy and sensitivity. A model example of how healthcare practices ought to be run.

More Info
SG

Sage G. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

No callback after blood tests taken

I had blood work completed but received no follow-up contact. When I called to check on the results, as I've been attempting to address a health concern for quite some time, I was informed that if the clinician felt a callback was necessary, they would have reached out, and that nothing further could be offered. I hadn't even had a conversation with the clinician in question. To be frank, I would prefer not to be registered with this practice at all.

More Info
VN

Victoria N. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Struggling to book face-to-face appointments

I have not been able to secure an in-person appointment for the past three years. Face-to-face consultations seem to be unavailable.

More Info
SW

Shereen W. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Couldn't get through on the phone

Extremely disappointing, to put it mildly!

More Info
JS

Jason S. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Frustrating phone queue delays and unhelpful recordings

I've been attempting to contact my GP since earlier in the week, and by now it's still unresolved. Each time I call, I receive an automated message with information that isn't relevant to my needs, followed by a request to hold the line. After several minutes of this cycle repeating, I'm forced to hang up. I'm quite frustrated by this situation and would like to understand what's happening.

More Info
JM

Jane M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Nurses could improve their attitude towards patients

The nursing staff's approach continues to be unwelcoming, with a lack of warmth and attentiveness during interactions.

More Info
CH

Claire H. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Phone consultation left me without proper follow-up

This surgery fell short of expectations. I was unable to obtain an in-person appointment and instead received a telephone consultation, during which I was instructed to perform a self-administered swab in the car park. I was prescribed three different medications in succession without seeing tangible improvement, and later discovered through private healthcare that I should have been offered a face-to-face assessment and a follow-up appointment once my initial course of treatment concluded.

More Info
JC

Jack C. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Receptionist was dismissive and unhelpful

Disappointing experience with front desk communication and unhelpful staff interactions

More Info
GB

Gordon B. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Couldn't get through on the phone system

I'm unable to access phone appointments due to my work schedule starting at 6am, which prevents me from making calls during business hours. When my partner attempted to book on my behalf, they encountered difficulties with the receptionist and were told that appointments cannot be arranged in advance. The practice requires patients to phone directly themselves, which doesn't work with my availability as I'm not free until mid-afternoon. After four years without needing medical care, I'm frustrated to find that accessing a doctor now feels impossible. I'm very dissatisfied with my experience at this practice and feel the appointment system is not fit for purpose.

More Info
EM

Eve M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Helpful staff made the visit worthwhile

Excellent facility. Occasionally visit but consistently receive helpful assistance from the team.

More Info
ST

Sharon T. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Consultation conducted outside in car park

I was very disappointed to have my consultation and chest examination conducted in the car park today. While I understand the need for safety measures, I feel appointments should be carried out inside the building in a manner that maintains appropriate precautions. I believe this can be achieved without compromising patient care. A proper, confidential appointment cannot be adequately conducted in an outdoor setting like a car park.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient feedback

Track improvement over time

Export evidence for CQC inspections

Claim your profile
GP Response Rate
0%

Practices that reply receive 3× more positive follow-up feedback

About the GP

  • Verified GP
  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01740 651238
  • The Surgery Durham Road Ferryhill County Durham DL17 8JJ

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience with significant variation in service quality across different areas of the practice. Telephone access remains a persistent challenge, with many patients reporting difficulty reaching the practice by phone, extended wait times on hold, and instances of connectivity issues. Reception experience is inconsistent, ranging from courteous and helpful interactions to dismissive and discourteous behaviour that has left some patients feeling unwelcome. Appointment availability and booking processes present ongoing concerns, with patients experiencing long waiting times before being seen, difficulties securing in-person consultations, and challenges navigating the appointment system, particularly for those with inflexible work schedules.

On a positive note, clinical staff are frequently described as professional and competent, with many patients appreciating the welcoming environment and accessible facilities. Several patients have experienced responsive care and continuity with established clinicians, and the practice's digital booking system has been praised for efficiency. However, concerns about follow-up communication and inadequate responsiveness to patient needs appear across multiple reviews, with some patients reporting insufficient follow-up after test results and delayed callback communications.

Organisational issues appear to underpin many service challenges, including disorganisation, poor communication between clinical staff, and limited information sharing with patients. While individual team members often demonstrate helpfulness and courtesy, systemic problems with appointment access, telephone responsiveness, and care coordination suggest the practice would benefit from addressing these operational and administrative aspects to improve overall patient experience.

Appointment

45.23 %
Poor

Reception

48.76 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.15 %
Great

Care

56.89 %
Average

Respect

51.42 %
Average

Seen on time

48.65 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating