Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reflects a mixed experience across clinical and administrative services. Positive feedback consistently highlights the professional competence and warmth of clinical staff, particularly during blood tests and routine procedures, with patients noting reassuring interactions and skilled technical practice. Reception teams are frequently praised for courtesy, helpfulness, and welcoming demeanor. Appointment access and phone responsiveness are reported as efficient by several patients, with some noting marked improvements compared to previous providers. Referral handling to hospital services has been managed smoothly in cases reported.

However, significant concerns emerge regarding consistency in clinical interactions and responsiveness during urgent situations. Multiple patients describe dismissive and unfriendly conduct from certain clinicians, with reports of inadequate communication and lack of respect, particularly affecting elderly and vulnerable patients. A serious gap in care responsiveness is evident in cases involving health crises, where patients requiring urgent pain management and support received delayed appointments rather than same day assistance. Operational issues include missed vaccination appointments due to insufficient advance notification of supply problems, and communication systems perceived as prioritising practice convenience over patient accessibility.

Additional concerns include inconsistent decision making around clinical requests, extended waiting times for appointments despite booking efficiency, and a pattern of poor interactions during initial consultations that have discouraged patients from returning. The feedback suggests variable standards of care depending on individual clinician and the nature of patient vulnerability, with particular gaps in supporting patients during acute health crises.

Appointment

55.00 %
Average

Reception

72.00 %
Great

Cleanliness

50.00 %
Average

Care

58.00 %
Average

Respect

52.00 %
Average

Seen on time

58.00 %
Average

Filter

DG

Darren G. Google 6 months ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception staff were dismissive and unhelpful

The service provided fell short of expectations and the manner in which I was treated was not particularly pleasant.

More Info
RW

Roger W. Google one year ago

Rating

Excellent!

Long-term patient values consistent care quality

We have been attending this practice for nearly 16 years. The service has consistently been excellent throughout our time here. We have found all staff members to be professional and helpful.

More Info
AC

Andy C. Google one year ago

Rating

Excellent!

Professional staff made me feel heard

I have nothing but positive things to say about this practice. The staff members are professional and the clinicians I have encountered have been understanding and compassionate. Occasionally there can be challenges in securing an appointment at short notice, though this appears to be a common issue throughout the NHS more broadly.

More Info
GD

Gillian D. Google one year ago

Rating

Great!

Friendly staff made me feel welcome

The staff are very friendly, the nursing team are very welcoming, and the reception staff are also very approachable and pleasant.

More Info
CL

Cora L. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Reception staff made an anxious visit easier

I would just like to say how lovely the reception staff are, they made a very upsetting and anxious situation much easier to deal with. They are both a credit to this practice and there needs to be more people like them. Thank you so much.

More Info
DS

Deborah S. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception was friendly but appointment disappointing

Upon relocating to the area, I attended my initial appointment at the practice. The reception team were welcoming and pleasant, however I found the clinician I consulted to be dismissive and unfriendly, with an unhelpful demeanor. It was a challenging interaction that required considerable patience on my part. I do not feel comfortable returning to see this particular clinician, as the overall experience fell well short of my expectations.

More Info
NR

Nate R. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Unhelpful and condescending consultation experience

I would recommend avoiding consultation with this particular clinician, as I found the interaction to be condescending and unhelpful. I did not feel the appointment was worthwhile.

More Info
SS

S S. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Surgery wouldn't provide blood test form

This surgery declined to issue a blood test form for my sister who has a chronic condition requiring regular monitoring. I was left wondering about the reasoning behind this decision and whether budget considerations may have influenced it.

More Info
FK

Fiona K. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Receptionists were helpful and polite throughout

I have been attending this practice for a considerable time. The clinical staff have consistently demonstrated a responsive approach, and the administrative team members are notably courteous and supportive. I have no concerns to raise.

More Info
GH

Gemma H. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Easy to reach and quick appointments

All of the staff members I have interacted with have demonstrated kindness and understanding. The service has been very responsive, with easy access through both telephone and digital channels, and appointments have been readily available when required. A recent referral to hospital services was handled efficiently and without complication by the practice. I appreciate the high standard of care provided.

More Info
DN

Dajana N. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Quick phone lines and prompt appointments here

I have consistently had positive experiences with the clinical staff at this practice. Appointments have always been prompt and the phone lines are answered efficiently, even during busy morning periods. This is a marked improvement compared to my previous surgery, where I would sometimes wait considerably longer to reach someone on the phone.

More Info
GN

Gerard N. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Text messages waste time before the queue

Receiving text messages from the surgery that cannot be responded to creates frustration, as this leads to a lengthy series of irrelevant messages for most people before being put on hold for an uncertain duration. It seems the surgery prioritises their own time over that of patients. Rather than having staff call back to handle communication directly, this system feels dismissive. While the practice claims to be busy, many patients are equally occupied, yet this approach comes across as inconsiderate.

More Info
KW

Ken W. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Dismissed with serious infection and misdiagnosis

I can understand why these negative reviews resonate with me, as my own experiences have been quite concerning. Around a decade ago, following a surgical procedure at a hospital, I was discharged with a complication affecting one of my surgical sites. The discomfort was significant, and I attended the medical centre in considerable distress. I was informed that an appointment might be available later in the day if I returned. The journey had taken considerably longer than usual due to my condition. As I was leaving, a receptionist approached and offered to arrange for me to be seen by a clinician. Several years later, I attended with throat symptoms following travel. During a telephone consultation, the clinician provided a diagnosis very quickly without fully exploring my symptoms, and I felt unheard. When I called back and requested to see a different clinician, I was able to have a more thorough consultation. This clinician suggested further investigation, which revealed a different underlying cause for my symptoms. Throughout these experiences, I received no acknowledgment of the initial mismanagement. I am left questioning the standard of care and the principles that should guide medical practice.

More Info
ES

Eve S. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Phlebotomist put nervous first-timer at ease

I had a blood test today and was quite anxious as it was my first time, but the healthcare professional who assisted me made the experience far less daunting than I had anticipated. They were genuinely warm and reassuring, which helped me feel much more comfortable, and they were very skilled at the procedure itself—I barely felt anything. They were absolutely brilliant.

More Info
MM

Melain M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Average!

Long wait times at the surgery

The appointment took longer than expected to be seen.

More Info
JU

Jordan U. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Pregnant patient left sitting outside without support

A heavily pregnant patient reported being asked to wait outside and was informed of removal from the practice list. The patient described experiencing distressing interactions over a period of weeks leading up to this point.

More Info
AR

A R. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Receptionist refused urgent pain relief appointment

The surgery notified my relative by telephone about a serious diagnosis. She is now in a critical condition and experiencing significant distress. She contacted the surgery requesting medical assistance as she required pain management. A receptionist responded in a manner she found lacking in compassion, indicating that a GP consultation was unavailable but that an appointment could be arranged for the following week. This response was deeply disappointing given her vulnerable circumstances as an elderly person living independently during a serious health crisis. I feel the surgery provided inadequate support during this difficult time. My relative has since relocated and registered with a different practice, which arranged for a healthcare professional to visit the same day and organised essential equipment within 24 hours. She is now receiving the care she requires.

More Info
PP

Pat P. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Average!

Surgery failed to notify about vaccine shortage

My mother attended an appointment for a routine vaccination on a Saturday. Upon arrival at the surgery, there were approximately ten to twelve other patients who also had scheduled appointments. However, no staff member appeared to open the facility or provide the vaccinations. It appears the clinic had exhausted their vaccine supply the previous day, but patients were not notified in advance of this situation.

More Info
JJ

Juliet J. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Phlebotomist made needle anxiety disappear

I recently attended an appointment for a blood test. The healthcare professional I saw was immediately reassuring and helped me feel comfortable, despite my anxiety about the procedure. I barely felt anything during the process. The staff member was warm, cheerful, and demonstrated excellent professionalism throughout - a real asset to the practice.

More Info
PR

Paul R. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Staff weren't welcoming to older patients

The staff displayed a dismissive manner, and I felt the practice showed little consideration towards elderly patients.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 0191 5483635
  • Fulwell Medical Centre Ebdon Lane, Fulwell Sunderland Tyne & Wear SR6 8DZ

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reflects a mixed experience across clinical and administrative services. Positive feedback consistently highlights the professional competence and warmth of clinical staff, particularly during blood tests and routine procedures, with patients noting reassuring interactions and skilled technical practice. Reception teams are frequently praised for courtesy, helpfulness, and welcoming demeanor. Appointment access and phone responsiveness are reported as efficient by several patients, with some noting marked improvements compared to previous providers. Referral handling to hospital services has been managed smoothly in cases reported.

However, significant concerns emerge regarding consistency in clinical interactions and responsiveness during urgent situations. Multiple patients describe dismissive and unfriendly conduct from certain clinicians, with reports of inadequate communication and lack of respect, particularly affecting elderly and vulnerable patients. A serious gap in care responsiveness is evident in cases involving health crises, where patients requiring urgent pain management and support received delayed appointments rather than same day assistance. Operational issues include missed vaccination appointments due to insufficient advance notification of supply problems, and communication systems perceived as prioritising practice convenience over patient accessibility.

Additional concerns include inconsistent decision making around clinical requests, extended waiting times for appointments despite booking efficiency, and a pattern of poor interactions during initial consultations that have discouraged patients from returning. The feedback suggests variable standards of care depending on individual clinician and the nature of patient vulnerability, with particular gaps in supporting patients during acute health crises.

Appointment

55.00 %
Average

Reception

72.00 %
Great

Cleanliness

50.00 %
Average

Care

58.00 %
Average

Respect

52.00 %
Average

Seen on time

58.00 %
Average
Filter

Order By

Rating