Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a practice experiencing significant operational challenges following a recent merger, with marked inconsistency in service delivery. Telephone access remains a persistent concern, with patients reporting lengthy waiting times, call disconnections, and difficulty reaching the practice, creating frustration particularly for those seeking urgent care. Appointment availability has become increasingly difficult to secure, with extended delays between initial contact and clinical assessment, and some patients describing convoluted booking processes involving online forms and callbacks rather than direct scheduling. Reception experience is mixed, with some patients praising courteous and helpful staff interactions, whilst others report dismissive or unhelpful conduct that has deterred further contact.

Clinical care quality also shows variation, with some patients commending thorough consultations and professional attention, whilst others describe rushed assessments and inadequate follow-up on test results and ongoing health concerns. Administrative processes have deteriorated, including delays in medication processing, unresponsive digital communication channels, and inconsistent handling of routine requests. Several patients note the practice operated more smoothly prior to the merger, suggesting the consolidation has stretched resources and affected service consistency across multiple areas.

Positive feedback acknowledges supportive staff, responsive communication when contact is achieved, and instances of prompt urgent care provision. However, the volume of concerns regarding access, responsiveness, and administrative efficiency substantially outweighs positive comments, indicating systemic issues requiring attention to restore patient confidence in the service.

Appointment

28.76 %
Bad

Reception

32.18 %
Bad

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

45.32 %
Poor

Respect

35.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

31.42 %
Bad

Filter

MG

Marjorie G. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Phone appointment led to wrong clinic visit

The experience was disappointing and fell short of expectations. A telephone consultation was arranged, but when attending the appointment, it was with a different healthcare professional than anticipated. This was frustrating, as it felt like the service was not meeting needs adequately. There are concerns about the availability of certain staff members and the impact this has had on overall care. It is acknowledged that circumstances have been challenging, but there is a sense that the service needs to improve and return to a better standard of provision.

More Info
LB

L B. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Phone lines harder to reach since merger

When this practice operated independently, everything functioned well and telephone access was achievable with some patience. Since the merger with another practice, the service has become significantly stretched and inconsistent. This is disappointing and creates a genuinely frustrating situation when you are unwell, feeling vulnerable, and seeking medical guidance.

More Info
NN

Nat N. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Impossible to get through on the phone

Awful experience, struggling to secure appointments and being instructed to call back the following day. Phone lines take considerable time to connect, with waits sometimes exceeding an hour. I would rate this lower than one star if that were possible, as even one star feels generous.

More Info
CC

Carolyn C. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Long phone waits and appointments gone by morning

The duration spent waiting for a response when calling can range considerably, sometimes taking 10 minutes or occasionally extending to around an hour. Being informed early in the morning that no further appointments with clinicians are available can be frustrating.

More Info
DT

D T. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Helpful staff who actually listen

A very supportive medical practice with an excellent team.

More Info
AF

Andrew F. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Friendly team that genuinely goes the extra mile

Absolutely brilliant, friendly and professional service. All members of staff work as one big happy and caring team. They have helped me through some difficult and trying health concerns, at times certainly going beyond what many practices would class as their standard responsibilities. A big thank you to all, I am sorry to be moving from the area.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
37.21%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01482 847250
  • 168 King Street Cottingham East Riding Of Yorkshire HU16 5QJ

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a practice experiencing significant operational challenges following a recent merger, with marked inconsistency in service delivery. Telephone access remains a persistent concern, with patients reporting lengthy waiting times, call disconnections, and difficulty reaching the practice, creating frustration particularly for those seeking urgent care. Appointment availability has become increasingly difficult to secure, with extended delays between initial contact and clinical assessment, and some patients describing convoluted booking processes involving online forms and callbacks rather than direct scheduling. Reception experience is mixed, with some patients praising courteous and helpful staff interactions, whilst others report dismissive or unhelpful conduct that has deterred further contact.

Clinical care quality also shows variation, with some patients commending thorough consultations and professional attention, whilst others describe rushed assessments and inadequate follow-up on test results and ongoing health concerns. Administrative processes have deteriorated, including delays in medication processing, unresponsive digital communication channels, and inconsistent handling of routine requests. Several patients note the practice operated more smoothly prior to the merger, suggesting the consolidation has stretched resources and affected service consistency across multiple areas.

Positive feedback acknowledges supportive staff, responsive communication when contact is achieved, and instances of prompt urgent care provision. However, the volume of concerns regarding access, responsiveness, and administrative efficiency substantially outweighs positive comments, indicating systemic issues requiring attention to restore patient confidence in the service.

Appointment

28.76 %
Bad

Reception

32.18 %
Bad

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

45.32 %
Poor

Respect

35.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

31.42 %
Bad
Filter

Order By

Rating