Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a significantly divided experience at this practice, with stark contrasts between clinical and administrative services. Medical staff, nursing teams, and clinical procedures consistently receive praise for professionalism, compassion, and clinical competence. However, appointment access and reception experience emerge as persistent problem areas, with patients reporting prolonged waiting times on phone lines, difficulty securing consultations, and inconsistent courtesy from front desk staff. The booking system presents particular challenges, with complaints about limited availability, inflexible scheduling that disadvantages working professionals, and unreliable online platforms. Communication gaps between departments and delayed prescription processing have also been noted across multiple reviews.

When patients successfully access clinical care, they frequently describe positive interactions with doctors and nursing staff who demonstrate attentiveness and genuine concern. Several reviews highlight efficient procedures, thorough assessments, and supportive team approaches during consultations. The practice environment itself is often described as clean and well-maintained. However, the difficulty in reaching appointments and variable reception courtesy create a significant barrier to care that undermines otherwise strong clinical service delivery. This disparity suggests that operational and administrative improvements could substantially enhance the overall patient experience without compromising the quality of clinical care already being provided.

Appointment

32.67 %
Bad

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

62.18 %
Average

Respect

42.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.42 %
Poor

Filter

OB

Owain B. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Excellent first visit to a welcoming medical practice

I was thoroughly impressed with my initial registration process and first visit. The new patient intake was swift, cordial, and conducted with utmost professionalism. The facility itself was immaculate and efficiently managed. Highly satisfied!

More Info
LT

Linzi T. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Terrible service for special needs child care

A completely unacceptable healthcare experience. I've been persistently calling throughout the week attempting to secure an appointment for my autistic son, who also struggles with multiple health complications, only to be repeatedly informed that no appointments are available and advised to call again every morning at 8:30am. My goal is to have him referred back to a paediatrician, but it seems impossible to even arrange a basic doctor's consultation. We're now forced to take him to Kingsmill Hospital due to his urgent symptoms and necessary medical support. At my previous medical practice, particularly when a child was involved, we were always accommodated with same-day emergency appointments. Additionally, the reception staff's communication and interpersonal skills are severely lacking when interacting with patients. I absolutely cannot and will not recommend this medical practice to anyone. My strongest advice is to avoid this surgery entirely.

More Info
JL

Jane L. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Transformative procedure with fantastic healing and results

Delightful procedure, and the positive changes are becoming quite apparent. Much appreciation.

More Info
JJ

Jnsbns J. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Worst healthcare experience with rude unprofessional staff

Marcia Daws is absolutely appalling. I sincerely hope we never encounter her again. She seemed more interested in being confrontational than addressing health concerns. Her disrespectful demeanor was so offensive that I had to respond in kind (and she clearly wasn't pleased about that). The moment we left, we immediately went to collect registration paperwork from an alternative medical facility.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01623 551015
  • King Street Sutton-In-Ashfield Nottinghamshire NG17 1AT

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a significantly divided experience at this practice, with stark contrasts between clinical and administrative services. Medical staff, nursing teams, and clinical procedures consistently receive praise for professionalism, compassion, and clinical competence. However, appointment access and reception experience emerge as persistent problem areas, with patients reporting prolonged waiting times on phone lines, difficulty securing consultations, and inconsistent courtesy from front desk staff. The booking system presents particular challenges, with complaints about limited availability, inflexible scheduling that disadvantages working professionals, and unreliable online platforms. Communication gaps between departments and delayed prescription processing have also been noted across multiple reviews.

When patients successfully access clinical care, they frequently describe positive interactions with doctors and nursing staff who demonstrate attentiveness and genuine concern. Several reviews highlight efficient procedures, thorough assessments, and supportive team approaches during consultations. The practice environment itself is often described as clean and well-maintained. However, the difficulty in reaching appointments and variable reception courtesy create a significant barrier to care that undermines otherwise strong clinical service delivery. This disparity suggests that operational and administrative improvements could substantially enhance the overall patient experience without compromising the quality of clinical care already being provided.

Appointment

32.67 %
Bad

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

62.18 %
Average

Respect

42.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.42 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating