Patient feedback reveals a practice with significant challenges in appointment access and reception experience, alongside pockets of excellent clinical care. Telephone contact remains a persistent barrier, with multiple patients reporting difficulty reaching the practice, prolonged waiting times, and automated systems that disconnect calls. In-person visits at opening times appear to be the most reliable booking method, though this creates additional burden for patients. Reception staff conduct is inconsistent, with some patients experiencing dismissive or unwelcoming interactions, whilst others report genuine helpfulness and politeness. Administrative processes show gaps in communication and follow-up, including missed prescriptions, unconfirmed appointments, and delayed information provision.
Where patients successfully access clinical consultations, care quality is frequently praised. Many describe attentive practitioners who listen carefully, provide thorough examinations, and demonstrate compassion. Several patients highlight individual clinicians as exceptional, noting their responsiveness and willingness to go beyond standard appointments. However, this positive clinical experience contrasts sharply with the access and administrative difficulties, creating a fragmented service perception.
The practice would benefit from addressing phone system capacity, standardising reception team training and conduct, improving administrative coordination between departments, and ensuring consistent follow-through on promised communications. The gap between clinical excellence and operational challenges represents the core tension in patient experience at this practice.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Respond to patient reviews
Monitor satisfaction trends
Generate CQC evidence reports
Claim & Manage ProfileShows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.
Patient feedback reveals a practice with significant challenges in appointment access and reception experience, alongside pockets of excellent clinical care. Telephone contact remains a persistent barrier, with multiple patients reporting difficulty reaching the practice, prolonged waiting times, and automated systems that disconnect calls. In-person visits at opening times appear to be the most reliable booking method, though this creates additional burden for patients. Reception staff conduct is inconsistent, with some patients experiencing dismissive or unwelcoming interactions, whilst others report genuine helpfulness and politeness. Administrative processes show gaps in communication and follow-up, including missed prescriptions, unconfirmed appointments, and delayed information provision.
Where patients successfully access clinical consultations, care quality is frequently praised. Many describe attentive practitioners who listen carefully, provide thorough examinations, and demonstrate compassion. Several patients highlight individual clinicians as exceptional, noting their responsiveness and willingness to go beyond standard appointments. However, this positive clinical experience contrasts sharply with the access and administrative difficulties, creating a fragmented service perception.
The practice would benefit from addressing phone system capacity, standardising reception team training and conduct, improving administrative coordination between departments, and ensuring consistent follow-through on promised communications. The gap between clinical excellence and operational challenges represents the core tension in patient experience at this practice.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Filter
Charli D.
9 years ago
Bad!
Couldn't get through on the phone lines
I have been attempting to reach the practice for an extended period without success. The main contact line provides an automated response before disconnecting, and when trying an alternative number, I experienced prolonged waiting with no answer before eventually abandoning the attempt. This proved to be a frustrating experience.