Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a deeply divided patient experience, with significant challenges in appointment access and booking processes dominating negative comments. Patients consistently report lengthy phone wait times, difficulty securing appointments despite calling at designated times, and frustration with limited availability. The booking experience emerges as a critical pain point, with some describing the process as nearly impossible and others noting contradictions between online information and actual appointment policies. Reception experience varies considerably, with some patients reporting courtesy and helpfulness whilst others describe staff as dismissive, condescending, or unhelpful, particularly when handling medication requests and appointment scheduling.

Communication barriers and administrative errors appear frequently across feedback, including medication management delays, prescription handling issues, and inconsistent record-keeping. Several patients report feeling deprioritised or receiving inadequate clinical attention, with concerns about continuity of care and access to doctors. However, positive themes emerge notably around vaccination services, emergency care responsiveness, and nursing staff compassion. Patients praise the efficiency and professionalism of vaccination clinics and highlight responsive emergency care when accessed.

A subset of patients report consistently positive experiences with appointment access, online consultations, and staff warmth, suggesting service quality varies significantly depending on individual circumstances and timing. The practice demonstrates capability in specific areas such as emergency response and vaccination delivery, yet struggles with routine appointment access and administrative consistency. This inconsistency in service delivery appears central to the overall negative tone, with patients expressing frustration that improvements promised through new systems have not materialised.

Appointment

32.15 %
Bad

Reception

38.21 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

48.76 %
Poor

Respect

42.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.64 %
Poor

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01303 235300
  • Oaklands Health Centre Stade Street Hythe Kent CT21 6BD

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a deeply divided patient experience, with significant challenges in appointment access and booking processes dominating negative comments. Patients consistently report lengthy phone wait times, difficulty securing appointments despite calling at designated times, and frustration with limited availability. The booking experience emerges as a critical pain point, with some describing the process as nearly impossible and others noting contradictions between online information and actual appointment policies. Reception experience varies considerably, with some patients reporting courtesy and helpfulness whilst others describe staff as dismissive, condescending, or unhelpful, particularly when handling medication requests and appointment scheduling.

Communication barriers and administrative errors appear frequently across feedback, including medication management delays, prescription handling issues, and inconsistent record-keeping. Several patients report feeling deprioritised or receiving inadequate clinical attention, with concerns about continuity of care and access to doctors. However, positive themes emerge notably around vaccination services, emergency care responsiveness, and nursing staff compassion. Patients praise the efficiency and professionalism of vaccination clinics and highlight responsive emergency care when accessed.

A subset of patients report consistently positive experiences with appointment access, online consultations, and staff warmth, suggesting service quality varies significantly depending on individual circumstances and timing. The practice demonstrates capability in specific areas such as emergency response and vaccination delivery, yet struggles with routine appointment access and administrative consistency. This inconsistency in service delivery appears central to the overall negative tone, with patients expressing frustration that improvements promised through new systems have not materialised.

Appointment

32.15 %
Bad

Reception

38.21 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

48.76 %
Poor

Respect

42.89 %
Poor

Seen on time

35.64 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating