Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reveals a practice with a stark divide between clinical and administrative experiences. Medical professionals are frequently praised for compassion, attentiveness, and professional expertise, with patients reporting positive care outcomes. However, appointment access presents a significant barrier, with patients describing persistent difficulties reaching the practice by phone, lengthy waiting times to speak with reception staff, and challenges securing timely slots. Reception experience emerges as a key concern, with multiple reports of discourteous interactions, poor communication, and lack of responsiveness when patients attempt to book appointments or follow up on test results. The booking process itself is described as inefficient, with patients experiencing multiple failed attempts, redirects between staff members, and delays in accessing prescriptions and referrals. Internal communication between reception and clinical teams appears inconsistent, leading to gaps in information transfer and delayed patient care. While some patients report seamless, efficient visits with welcoming staff, these positive experiences contrast sharply with widespread complaints about organisational inefficiency and the accessibility of services.

The practice demonstrates professional medical expertise and genuine care during consultations, yet administrative processes significantly undermine the overall service quality. Patients express frustration that despite being registered, they struggle to access basic services, and several indicate they have switched practices due to these systemic barriers. Improvements in phone system functionality, reception training, appointment availability, and internal coordination would likely address the most frequently cited service concerns.

Appointment

28.73 %
Bad

Reception

32.18 %
Bad

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

68.92 %
Great

Respect

35.64 %
Poor

Seen on time

31.27 %
Bad

Filter

JB

Jemma B. Google 5 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Reception staff let down the good doctors

The reception team is courteous, yet undeniably the least competent and prepared compared to other medical practices I've encountered. They seem poorly informed about basic administrative procedures, struggling with standard documents like MAT B1 forms, and appear clueless about vaccination scheduling and booking processes for routine immunizations like the Whooping Cough vaccine. It's frustrating that patients' initial interaction is with such ill-equipped front-line staff. It's particularly disappointing because the surgery actually has some exceptional doctors - one in particular who stands out as possibly the most outstanding physician I've ever seen. Unfortunately, the reception staff's inadequacies significantly undermine the overall quality of the practice.

More Info
RS

Redrum S. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Scary wait for critical health results

Absolutely terrible ordeal. Blood test clinic contacted me indicating concerning results and advised seeing a physician. Visited reception to schedule an appointment. The receptionist was incredibly discourteous and could only offer an appointment two weeks out. I pleaded for an earlier slot but was flatly refused. I'm feeling extremely anxious. It seems I'll have no choice but to switch medical practices because I no longer feel my health is being taken seriously or protected here.

More Info
CB

Chiara B. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Stuck in endless hold queue at 8am

I'm completely frustrated by the booking process. This morning, I wasted 20 minutes attempting to enter the hold queue at 8am, only to be repeatedly disconnected. The customer service is absolutely unacceptable, especially for individuals trying to access critical medical support. The way patients are being treated is shameful and unprofessional. Terrible service!!!

More Info
MC

Mario C. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Tough to get a doctor's slot

Schedule well ahead of time if you're anticipating any health issues. In the unlikely event you actually secure a slot, the staff tends to be quite pleasant.

More Info
MM

Melissa M. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Finally getting answers after two years

After enduring a debilitating health condition for 24 months, I was compelled to seek a new medical professional. The subsequent physician referred me to a specialist, and I'm now receiving the appropriate care I've desperately needed. Previously, my concerns were dismissed and not given the gravity they deserved. Fortunately, I have comprehensive health insurance, so there was absolutely no justification for minimizing my significant medical symptoms.

More Info
KK

Kelly K. Google 6 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Endless runaround for simple registration

It's a complete mockery of service. Regarding registration..... They force you to make multiple visits for a single task because they consistently fail to provide comprehensive information upfront. When registering, you're sent back and forth: one visit reveals a missing document, another requires waiting 1-2 weeks for processing, and then another trip to collect your online access form. Ultimately, three days were consumed, and it took 15 days to complete online access! The entire process is an absolute squandering of people's time just for registration. About booking appointments... I scheduled a cervical screening test, but they misplaced my appointment, compelling me to rebook and waste another two weeks. About following up appointments.... Continuous complications persist. After waiting over two months for ECG results, I'm forced to directly contact cardiology at the hospital. The hospital insists the GP should follow up, while my GP's receptionists claim ignorance of my test date and refuse to pursue the results unless I persistently call. When I do call, they've seemingly forgotten all previous interactions and complaints. They urgently need to establish proper procedures enabling receptionists to assist doctors in tracking patient tests and results! About phone communication.... Receptionists are utterly incapable of resolving issues. When answering calls, they constantly deflect responsibility, keeping me trapped in a cycle of repeated calls. Each new representative lacks knowledge of my case history, forcing me to repeatedly explain everything, ultimately being redirected to another hospital number. They promise callbacks that never materialize, pretending to investigate with doctors but ultimately abandoning the issue. Their strategy appears to be providing a phone number to effectively dismiss me, initiating an endless, frustrating loop. This service is tremendously inefficient, especially considering the high taxes we pay. Immediate process improvements are desperately needed! IT IS ABSOLUTELY HORRENDOUS!

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient feedback

Track improvement over time

Export evidence for CQC inspections

Claim your profile
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Verified GP
  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 020 88861115
  • Oakwood Medical Centre Malcolms Way,Reservoir Rd Southgate London N14 4AQ

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reveals a practice with a stark divide between clinical and administrative experiences. Medical professionals are frequently praised for compassion, attentiveness, and professional expertise, with patients reporting positive care outcomes. However, appointment access presents a significant barrier, with patients describing persistent difficulties reaching the practice by phone, lengthy waiting times to speak with reception staff, and challenges securing timely slots. Reception experience emerges as a key concern, with multiple reports of discourteous interactions, poor communication, and lack of responsiveness when patients attempt to book appointments or follow up on test results. The booking process itself is described as inefficient, with patients experiencing multiple failed attempts, redirects between staff members, and delays in accessing prescriptions and referrals. Internal communication between reception and clinical teams appears inconsistent, leading to gaps in information transfer and delayed patient care. While some patients report seamless, efficient visits with welcoming staff, these positive experiences contrast sharply with widespread complaints about organisational inefficiency and the accessibility of services.

The practice demonstrates professional medical expertise and genuine care during consultations, yet administrative processes significantly undermine the overall service quality. Patients express frustration that despite being registered, they struggle to access basic services, and several indicate they have switched practices due to these systemic barriers. Improvements in phone system functionality, reception training, appointment availability, and internal coordination would likely address the most frequently cited service concerns.

Appointment

28.73 %
Bad

Reception

32.18 %
Bad

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

68.92 %
Great

Respect

35.64 %
Poor

Seen on time

31.27 %
Bad
Filter

Order By

Rating