Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a mixed experience with significant variation in service quality across different areas of the practice. Reception experience emerges as a key concern, with multiple patients reporting discourteous communication, difficulty reaching staff by phone, and challenges with appointment booking. Patients describe long waiting times for phone responses, dismissive attitudes during initial contact, and inconsistent availability information. Administrative processes also feature prominently in negative feedback, with complaints about slow registration procedures and delayed responses to enquiries. In contrast, the medical practitioners themselves receive consistent praise for compassionate care, professional expertise, and attentive listening during consultations.

Appointment access presents a recurring frustration, with patients reporting difficulty securing slots and experiencing extended phone waits. Some patients note that availability information provided initially contradicts what becomes possible when calling back later. Communication barriers, including limited language support, have also been highlighted as problematic.

Positive feedback emphasises the dedication and interpersonal skills of clinical staff, with patients appreciating empathetic consultations and thorough care. Several long-standing patients report satisfaction with continuity of care and the team's commitment to patient wellbeing. The practice would benefit from addressing reception experience and administrative responsiveness to better align with the quality of clinical care being provided.

Appointment

35.64 %
Poor

Reception

38.21 %
Poor

Cleanliness

50.00 %
Average

Care

52.18 %
Average

Respect

40.15 %
Poor

Seen on time

42.87 %
Poor

Filter

EH

Eliot H. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Receptionists need a serious attitude and skills adjustment

The front desk staff's communication abilities appear to range from exasperated sighing to outright discourtesy, with little in between. Their informational guidance comes across as patronizing and ineffective. Despite the already minimal expectations for answering phones and sharing details about appointments and services, they consistently fall short of even these basic standards. What personal trauma has transformed you into such disengaged professionals? In fairness, this critique should be tempered by acknowledging that the medical practitioners themselves demonstrate excellent interpersonal skills, displaying empathy, clarity, comprehensive knowledge, and a sincere desire to assist patients. One can only speculate about the root cause of their apparent workplace frustration. Perhaps a moment of respite with a warm beverage and a small treat might improve their demeanor?

More Info
RS

Richard S. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Decent healthcare with friendly faces and service

Consistently available during required hours, the front desk staff maintain a pleasant demeanor, and the doctors provide satisfactory care.

More Info
CN

Carmel N. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Exceptional care from a trusted medical team

Throughout my two decades as a patient at this practice, I have consistently experienced exceptional care characterized by compassion and understanding. The reception staff are courteous, caring, and go above and beyond to provide outstanding assistance.

More Info
VI

Viktors I. Google 9 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Worst customer experience ever avoid at all costs

Absolutely terrible service - this establishment is so incompetent that regulatory authorities should seriously consider shutting them down completely.

More Info
VP

Vinit P. Google 9 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Terrible customer service that left me frustrated

Absolutely terrible customer service, impossible to schedule appointments via phone calls, and their communication is utterly ineffective and frustrating.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient feedback

Track improvement over time

Export evidence for CQC inspections

Claim your profile
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Verified GP
  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a mixed experience with significant variation in service quality across different areas of the practice. Reception experience emerges as a key concern, with multiple patients reporting discourteous communication, difficulty reaching staff by phone, and challenges with appointment booking. Patients describe long waiting times for phone responses, dismissive attitudes during initial contact, and inconsistent availability information. Administrative processes also feature prominently in negative feedback, with complaints about slow registration procedures and delayed responses to enquiries. In contrast, the medical practitioners themselves receive consistent praise for compassionate care, professional expertise, and attentive listening during consultations.

Appointment access presents a recurring frustration, with patients reporting difficulty securing slots and experiencing extended phone waits. Some patients note that availability information provided initially contradicts what becomes possible when calling back later. Communication barriers, including limited language support, have also been highlighted as problematic.

Positive feedback emphasises the dedication and interpersonal skills of clinical staff, with patients appreciating empathetic consultations and thorough care. Several long-standing patients report satisfaction with continuity of care and the team's commitment to patient wellbeing. The practice would benefit from addressing reception experience and administrative responsiveness to better align with the quality of clinical care being provided.

Appointment

35.64 %
Poor

Reception

38.21 %
Poor

Cleanliness

50.00 %
Average

Care

52.18 %
Average

Respect

40.15 %
Poor

Seen on time

42.87 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating