Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a mixed experience with significant operational challenges alongside positive clinical care. When patients successfully access appointments, they consistently report excellent clinical skills, thorough consultations, and professional healthcare delivery. However, substantial barriers to access dominate the feedback, with persistent difficulties reaching the practice by telephone, lengthy waiting times on hold, and limited appointment availability creating frustration across the patient population. Reception experience varies considerably, with some patients describing helpful and courteous staff whilst others report unwelcoming interactions. Administrative systems present ongoing concerns, including prescription processing delays, inconsistent communication, and poor organisation of appointment booking processes. Several patients note that the practice appears stretched to meet current demand, and some have experienced deterioration in service standards over time. Online consultation services receive positive mentions when functioning effectively, though technical issues and system navigation difficulties have been reported. The practice's responsiveness to patient concerns and communication about service changes requires improvement.

Patients who have managed to secure care during urgent situations or complex health matters express genuine gratitude for the clinical team's dedication and thoroughness. Continuity of care and knowledge of patient history are valued when appointments are achieved. However, the cumulative effect of access difficulties, administrative inefficiency, and inconsistent reception experiences has led some long-standing patients to consider alternatives or express concern about the practice's trajectory. The feedback suggests that whilst clinical quality remains a strength, the practice's operational systems and capacity to meet demand require urgent attention to improve the overall patient experience.

Appointment

35.67 %
Poor

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

68.92 %
Great

Respect

52.18 %
Average

Seen on time

42.89 %
Poor

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01661 825513
  • Ponteland Prim. Care Ctr. Meadowfield, Ponteland Newcastle Upon Tyne NE20 9SD

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a mixed experience with significant operational challenges alongside positive clinical care. When patients successfully access appointments, they consistently report excellent clinical skills, thorough consultations, and professional healthcare delivery. However, substantial barriers to access dominate the feedback, with persistent difficulties reaching the practice by telephone, lengthy waiting times on hold, and limited appointment availability creating frustration across the patient population. Reception experience varies considerably, with some patients describing helpful and courteous staff whilst others report unwelcoming interactions. Administrative systems present ongoing concerns, including prescription processing delays, inconsistent communication, and poor organisation of appointment booking processes. Several patients note that the practice appears stretched to meet current demand, and some have experienced deterioration in service standards over time. Online consultation services receive positive mentions when functioning effectively, though technical issues and system navigation difficulties have been reported. The practice's responsiveness to patient concerns and communication about service changes requires improvement.

Patients who have managed to secure care during urgent situations or complex health matters express genuine gratitude for the clinical team's dedication and thoroughness. Continuity of care and knowledge of patient history are valued when appointments are achieved. However, the cumulative effect of access difficulties, administrative inefficiency, and inconsistent reception experiences has led some long-standing patients to consider alternatives or express concern about the practice's trajectory. The feedback suggests that whilst clinical quality remains a strength, the practice's operational systems and capacity to meet demand require urgent attention to improve the overall patient experience.

Appointment

35.67 %
Poor

Reception

38.45 %
Poor

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

68.92 %
Great

Respect

52.18 %
Average

Seen on time

42.89 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating