Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a practice experiencing significant operational challenges that substantially impact patient access to care. Appointment availability remains the dominant concern, with patients reporting extreme difficulty securing slots through both telephone and online booking systems. The practice operates primarily on a same-day appointment model requiring early morning contact, creating barriers for those unable to call at opening times or attend in person. Telephone access is frequently problematic, with high call volumes, disconnections, and lengthy waiting times reported consistently. Reception experience is mixed, with some patients praising courteous and helpful staff, while others describe gatekeeping behaviour and dismissive interactions. Communication breakdowns occur regularly, including inadequate follow-up on test results, delayed responses to requests, and insufficient clarity about ongoing care pathways.

When patients do access clinical services, feedback on care quality is generally positive, with nursing and clinical staff frequently described as compassionate, thorough, and responsive. Several patients specifically appreciated the attentiveness and professionalism of clinical teams. However, these positive clinical experiences are substantially overshadowed by systemic access issues that prevent many patients from receiving care when needed. Administrative processes have also been problematic, with delays in document processing, medication ordering difficulties, and system changes causing confusion.

The practice appears to be struggling with capacity relative to demand. Long-term patients report noticeable decline from previous standards, particularly following management changes. While some recent reviews indicate improved experiences with responsive care and efficient service delivery, the overall pattern suggests persistent challenges with appointment availability, communication, and accessibility that require urgent attention to meet patient needs effectively.

Appointment

28.90 %
Bad

Reception

42.30 %
Poor

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

58.75 %
Average

Respect

45.20 %
Poor

Seen on time

32.15 %
Bad

Filter

MC

Matthew C. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Felt rushed through appointment without proper investigation

I recently attended an appointment regarding a physical concern that has been causing me worry, as it appears to be growing. I was given an initial assessment, but when I expressed doubt about this diagnosis and voiced my concerns, I was advised to seek a second opinion elsewhere. The interaction left me feeling somewhat dismissed rather than thoroughly heard or investigated. I felt the appointment prioritised moving through the schedule rather than taking adequate time to address my anxieties about the issue.

More Info
LM

Laura M. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Felt heard during appointment despite rushed slots

The practice overall appears to have declined following the recent change in management, with staffing levels seeming stretched, which makes it difficult to feel heard given the brief appointment durations. However, I recently attended for a routine screening procedure at this location, and the clinical staff member who assisted me was genuinely excellent. Despite my initial anxiety about the appointment, they demonstrated exceptional kindness and patience, taking time to explain each step thoroughly and helping me feel at ease. I felt their professionalism and compassionate approach deserved acknowledgment and praise.

More Info
NM

Nicola M. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Reception handled the emergency finger injury well

My partner attended the surgery with a significant finger injury and we would like to express our appreciation to the reception team, nursing staff, and the clinician for their swift response. It exemplified the NHS functioning at its finest.

More Info
ED

Elizabeth D. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Appointment text missing link, long phone wait

Received a text message with an appointment time and instructions to use a link if unable to attend, but the link was not included. Called the practice and reached position 2 in the queue before the call disconnected. Drove to the surgery and showed the message to staff member, who explained that the call had been dropped. Currently waiting for a callback from the doctor after spending nearly an hour attempting to reach the practice by phone.

More Info
AA

Anon A. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Helpful clinicians but frustrating booking system

Excellent clinical staff, but the administrative side needs improvement. The online appointment booking system is no longer available.

More Info
HH

Heloise H. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Phone staff were dismissive and unhelpful throughout

The practice has deteriorated significantly since the change in management. The situation appears to be getting progressively worse. The reception staff come across as somewhat unwelcoming and dismissive from the initial contact, and they seem to act as though they hold considerable authority. Accessing care when needed is increasingly difficult. Appointment availability is extremely limited. Getting through by phone feels entirely dependent on chance. With work commitments starting early in the morning, it's not feasible to queue at the practice entrance to complete paperwork and hope for an available slot that day. It's unclear why regulatory oversight hasn't intervened. Prior to the management change, securing an appointment was straightforward and without difficulty.

More Info
BC

Bill C. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Understaffed but genuinely helpful and pleasant

Similar to many general practices, this surgery faces challenges and occasional staffing difficulties. However, the team appears committed to doing their best, and all the staff members I have encountered have been courteous and supportive.

More Info
CH

Catherine H. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Phone system keeps cutting you off

The appointment system appears to undergo frequent changes, and the telephone service frequently disconnects calls. The morning registration process requires attendance at 8am to complete forms distinguishing between urgent and routine needs. The reception staff seem to be managing with limited resources, operating on a day-to-day basis without clear arrangements for patients unable to attend early morning appointments. There is no digital assessment option available. Overall, the current system does not appear to meet patient needs effectively.

More Info
PP

Paigebmw P. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Impossible to book an appointment here

This practice has been disappointing to use. It has been difficult to secure appointments due to high call volumes during peak times.

More Info
MW

Malcolm W. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Reception staff sorted my problem immediately

Attempted to contact via telephone without success, so visited the reception desk instead where the staff proved to be quite supportive. My issue was resolved promptly on that visit.

More Info
SS

Shannen S. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Felt listened to and genuinely cared for

Had a wonderful experience with the nursing staff who took the time to listen to my concerns. Much appreciated!

More Info
PARTNER
Patient Feedback Champion

This practice actively listens to patient experiences and is committed to improving services through feedback and engagement.

Verified by GP Ratings
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects a practice experiencing significant operational challenges that substantially impact patient access to care. Appointment availability remains the dominant concern, with patients reporting extreme difficulty securing slots through both telephone and online booking systems. The practice operates primarily on a same-day appointment model requiring early morning contact, creating barriers for those unable to call at opening times or attend in person. Telephone access is frequently problematic, with high call volumes, disconnections, and lengthy waiting times reported consistently. Reception experience is mixed, with some patients praising courteous and helpful staff, while others describe gatekeeping behaviour and dismissive interactions. Communication breakdowns occur regularly, including inadequate follow-up on test results, delayed responses to requests, and insufficient clarity about ongoing care pathways.

When patients do access clinical services, feedback on care quality is generally positive, with nursing and clinical staff frequently described as compassionate, thorough, and responsive. Several patients specifically appreciated the attentiveness and professionalism of clinical teams. However, these positive clinical experiences are substantially overshadowed by systemic access issues that prevent many patients from receiving care when needed. Administrative processes have also been problematic, with delays in document processing, medication ordering difficulties, and system changes causing confusion.

The practice appears to be struggling with capacity relative to demand. Long-term patients report noticeable decline from previous standards, particularly following management changes. While some recent reviews indicate improved experiences with responsive care and efficient service delivery, the overall pattern suggests persistent challenges with appointment availability, communication, and accessibility that require urgent attention to meet patient needs effectively.

Appointment

28.90 %
Bad

Reception

42.30 %
Poor

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

58.75 %
Average

Respect

45.20 %
Poor

Seen on time

32.15 %
Bad
Filter

Order By

Rating