Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects mixed experiences across the practice, with significant concerns about communication and care approach from some clinicians. Patients reported dismissive interactions, extended waiting times for telephone access, and abrupt reception experiences that fell short of expectations. Several patients described feeling their concerns were not taken seriously, with one noting a lack of engagement during consultations and another experiencing extended delays in accessing necessary referrals.

Whilst some patients have experienced excellent care from certain clinicians and would recommend the practice, others have chosen to seek care elsewhere due to their experiences. The variation in care quality appears to be clinician dependent, with patients acknowledging that different practitioners within the surgery provide notably different standards of interaction and responsiveness to patient concerns.

Appointment

35.00 %
Poor

Reception

28.00 %
Bad

Cleanliness

50.00 %
Average

Care

25.00 %
Bad

Respect

20.00 %
Bad

Seen on time

15.00 %
Bad

Filter

AS

Amanda S. Google one year ago

Rating

Excellent!

Friendly reception made us feel welcome

This is a fantastic practice that my partner and I would highly recommend to anyone.

More Info
BB

Blokefromhull B. Google 2 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Dismissed concerns without proper investigation or referral

A clinician at this practice did not appear particularly engaged during consultations. When my daughter sought a referral for a diagnostic procedure, the clinician declined, stating it was unnecessary and expressing concern about how it might reflect on them. Following over a year of pursuing this matter independently, the diagnosis was eventually confirmed. This same clinician has attributed virtually every health concern I have presented to weight-related factors, including symptoms that subsequently proved to be related to anxiety rather than weight. The approach to diagnosis felt dismissive and disengaged, which is disappointing given that other clinicians at this surgery provide excellent care.

More Info
AA

Aiden A. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Phone queue left me waiting far too long

Waited in a queue for over an hour to speak to a healthcare professional about my unwell infant. Once the call was eventually answered, the receptionist's manner was dismissive and the call was terminated abruptly. I found the overall experience to be extremely disappointing and felt the service fell well short of expectations. I have decided to seek care elsewhere for my family.

More Info
RA

R A. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Felt unheard and dismissed during appointment

A particular clinician at this practice demonstrated an approach that I found disappointing. In my experience, their manner was not conducive to a positive patient interaction, and I felt their attitude fell short of what I would expect from a healthcare professional. I have concerns about the quality of care experience provided, though I recognise others may have different experiences.

More Info
JM

Justyna M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Staff refused to take responsibility for mistakes

I would not rate this experience positively. The team did not appear to take accountability for what occurred. The interaction was unhelpful and dismissive. I intend to escalate this matter to the relevant complaints authority.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01482 857190
  • The Orchard Centre 210 Orchard Park Road Kingston Upon Hull HU6 9BX

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reflects mixed experiences across the practice, with significant concerns about communication and care approach from some clinicians. Patients reported dismissive interactions, extended waiting times for telephone access, and abrupt reception experiences that fell short of expectations. Several patients described feeling their concerns were not taken seriously, with one noting a lack of engagement during consultations and another experiencing extended delays in accessing necessary referrals.

Whilst some patients have experienced excellent care from certain clinicians and would recommend the practice, others have chosen to seek care elsewhere due to their experiences. The variation in care quality appears to be clinician dependent, with patients acknowledging that different practitioners within the surgery provide notably different standards of interaction and responsiveness to patient concerns.

Appointment

35.00 %
Poor

Reception

28.00 %
Bad

Cleanliness

50.00 %
Average

Care

25.00 %
Bad

Respect

20.00 %
Bad

Seen on time

15.00 %
Bad
Filter

Order By

Rating