Patient feedback reflects a mixed experience across the practice, with notable strengths in clinical care and phlebotomy services alongside persistent challenges with appointment access. Many patients commend the clinical team for demonstrating genuine care, thoroughness, and compassionate approach to consultations, whilst reception and administrative staff receive frequent praise for courtesy and helpfulness. However, appointment availability emerges as a significant and recurring concern, with patients reporting difficulty securing timely slots, extended waiting times both for booking and in-person visits, and limited urgent appointment capacity. Some patients describe consultations as rushed when appointments are obtained, and a pattern of inconsistent reception courtesy appears across multiple reviews, with occasional reports of dismissive or unwelcoming interactions. Continuity of care presents another challenge, with feedback indicating that different practitioners may not always be familiar with individual patient histories. The practice has demonstrated some positive changes in recent months, particularly regarding booking improvements and front desk interactions, though systemic issues around appointment availability and follow-up communication persist. Specialist services such as phlebotomy and prescription processing are consistently highlighted as efficient and professional.
Clinical assessments are generally described as thorough and attentive, with patients appreciating the time taken to listen and explain treatment options. The practice's responsiveness to patient needs during challenging health periods is valued, and several long-term patients express confidence in the care provided. However, concerns about administrative organisation, particularly regarding appointment scheduling reliability and medical records access, suggest room for improvement in back-office operations. The reception experience remains variable, with some patients finding staff welcoming and supportive whilst others report feeling their concerns were minimised or that communication could be more proactive. Overall, whilst the practice demonstrates clinical competence and individual staff members receive genuine appreciation, structural challenges around appointment systems and consistency in patient interactions require attention to enhance the broader service experience.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Respond to patient reviews
Monitor satisfaction trends
Generate CQC evidence reports
Claim & Manage ProfileShows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.
Patient feedback reflects a mixed experience across the practice, with notable strengths in clinical care and phlebotomy services alongside persistent challenges with appointment access. Many patients commend the clinical team for demonstrating genuine care, thoroughness, and compassionate approach to consultations, whilst reception and administrative staff receive frequent praise for courtesy and helpfulness. However, appointment availability emerges as a significant and recurring concern, with patients reporting difficulty securing timely slots, extended waiting times both for booking and in-person visits, and limited urgent appointment capacity. Some patients describe consultations as rushed when appointments are obtained, and a pattern of inconsistent reception courtesy appears across multiple reviews, with occasional reports of dismissive or unwelcoming interactions. Continuity of care presents another challenge, with feedback indicating that different practitioners may not always be familiar with individual patient histories. The practice has demonstrated some positive changes in recent months, particularly regarding booking improvements and front desk interactions, though systemic issues around appointment availability and follow-up communication persist. Specialist services such as phlebotomy and prescription processing are consistently highlighted as efficient and professional.
Clinical assessments are generally described as thorough and attentive, with patients appreciating the time taken to listen and explain treatment options. The practice's responsiveness to patient needs during challenging health periods is valued, and several long-term patients express confidence in the care provided. However, concerns about administrative organisation, particularly regarding appointment scheduling reliability and medical records access, suggest room for improvement in back-office operations. The reception experience remains variable, with some patients finding staff welcoming and supportive whilst others report feeling their concerns were minimised or that communication could be more proactive. Overall, whilst the practice demonstrates clinical competence and individual staff members receive genuine appreciation, structural challenges around appointment systems and consistency in patient interactions require attention to enhance the broader service experience.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Filter
Marta Q.
2 years ago
Bad!
Reception staff made booking difficult and unhelpful
I would strongly advise against using this practice. While the clinical staff demonstrate genuine care and concern, accessing their services presents significant challenges. The administrative team at the front desk proved to be unhelpful, dismissive, and discourteous throughout my interactions. This has been my most disappointing experience with a medical facility. In response to the practice's suggestion for improvement: genuine enhancement of customer service would involve addressing patient concerns through direct email communication rather than requesting specific appointment details in public responses to feedback.