Feedback reveals a significant divide between clinical and reception services. The clinical staff are consistently praised for competence, attentiveness, and professional care, with many patients noting efficient appointment booking through online systems and same-day availability. However, reception experiences present substantial challenges, with widespread reports of discourteous interactions, dismissive communication, and unhelpful responses to patient inquiries. Telephone access remains problematic, with patients describing lengthy waits and frequent disconnections when attempting to book appointments or reach the practice.
Communication breakdowns between reception and clinical teams have created operational difficulties, including delayed patient notifications and lost appointment information. Patients report struggling to arrange appointments via phone, with some describing the process as frustrating and unnecessarily complicated. Several reviews indicate reception staff appear unmotivated or stressed, affecting the quality of patient interactions. Additionally, concerns about continuity of care emerge, with patients seeing different clinicians at each visit despite requesting to see the same practitioner.
While clinical competence and appointment efficiency represent genuine strengths, the reception experience requires urgent attention. Patients consistently highlight the need for improved staff training in courtesy, communication, and responsiveness. The contrast between positive clinical feedback and negative reception feedback suggests that targeted improvements to reception operations and staff support could significantly enhance overall patient satisfaction.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Respond to patient feedback
Track improvement over time
Export evidence for CQC inspections
Claim your profileShows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.
Feedback reveals a significant divide between clinical and reception services. The clinical staff are consistently praised for competence, attentiveness, and professional care, with many patients noting efficient appointment booking through online systems and same-day availability. However, reception experiences present substantial challenges, with widespread reports of discourteous interactions, dismissive communication, and unhelpful responses to patient inquiries. Telephone access remains problematic, with patients describing lengthy waits and frequent disconnections when attempting to book appointments or reach the practice.
Communication breakdowns between reception and clinical teams have created operational difficulties, including delayed patient notifications and lost appointment information. Patients report struggling to arrange appointments via phone, with some describing the process as frustrating and unnecessarily complicated. Several reviews indicate reception staff appear unmotivated or stressed, affecting the quality of patient interactions. Additionally, concerns about continuity of care emerge, with patients seeing different clinicians at each visit despite requesting to see the same practitioner.
While clinical competence and appointment efficiency represent genuine strengths, the reception experience requires urgent attention. Patients consistently highlight the need for improved staff training in courtesy, communication, and responsiveness. The contrast between positive clinical feedback and negative reception feedback suggests that targeted improvements to reception operations and staff support could significantly enhance overall patient satisfaction.
Appointment
Reception
Cleanliness
Care
Respect
Seen on time
Filter
Lexi F.
6 years ago
Excellent!
Kind receptionists at a busy surgery
The reception team consistently demonstrated kindness and helpfulness, making genuine efforts to assist patients despite the surgery's evident high demand. Having experienced other practices previously, I found the service here to be notably better. The availability of an on-call healthcare professional each day for urgent matters is a valuable feature that sets this practice apart from many others. Several members of the clinical team provided excellent care. I would suggest this practice to others looking for a GP in the area.
Ama A.
6 years ago
Bad!
Reception staff could be more welcoming
This practice appears to be declining in quality. The reception team's manner comes across as unwelcoming and abrupt.
Juan L.
6 years ago
Bad!
Couldn't get through on the phone line
An extremely disappointing experience at this practice, falling well short of expectations.
Sue T.
6 years ago
Poor!
Staff weren't friendly or welcoming
The staff members were not courteous or welcoming. They appeared dismissive and did not reciprocate friendly interactions. I am currently considering alternative healthcare providers.
B H.
6 years ago
Bad!
Receptionists could be more helpful and polite
The medical practitioners are satisfactory, however certain members of the reception team can be dismissive, uncooperative and discourteous.
Somang L.
6 years ago
Bad!
Receptionist was dismissive about waiting times
I inquired about the expected waiting time and received a brief, dismissive response. I would not suggest this practice to others.
Lorna C.
6 years ago
Excellent!
Friendly staff who really listened to me
Outstanding care provided. The staff were warm and welcoming. They demonstrated considerable patience and empathy throughout. The practice proved to be highly flexible and encouraging in their approach.
Martina R.
6 years ago
Great!
Doctor availability varies, phone lines struggle
The clinical team members each bring their own approach and manner to consultations, so the experience can differ depending on who you see, and it's challenging to maintain continuity with the same practitioner. I was disappointed when a preferred clinician moved on. On one occasion, I received a telephone consultation where the clinician expressed time constraints and suggested a particular medication when I requested further clarification. I felt my questions about my own health were important to ask, though I recognise that telephone consultations have limitations, even if they may offer practical benefits given current NHS pressures. The reception team's availability has been inconsistent at times. There have been occasions when I've attended in person to book an appointment because telephone lines weren't being answered. However, they are generally as helpful as circumstances allow. It's difficult to assess the service quality in broader context. What I can say is that I've received substantial clinical time and have found solutions to my health concerns. The doctors clearly work diligently and manage demanding schedules seeing numerous patients daily.
Sofi A.
6 years ago
Bad!
Reception staff weren't helpful or attentive
The service quality is quite poor, and the reception area is particularly problematic. The staff members working there appear unmotivated and unprofessional. They frequently seem distracted and inattentive, and when approached with requests, they often appear unable or unwilling to assist properly.
Aaa Z.
6 years ago
Bad!
Phone queue kept dropping me back
Disappointing experience with the booking process. Calling to arrange an appointment proved very difficult, with lengthy wait times and frequent disconnections. The phone system made it frustrating to complete a simple booking request.
Peggy K.
6 years ago
Bad!
Turned away minutes before closing time
I attended the centre shortly before closing time for a blood test appointment. Unfortunately, the available staff member was unable to see me as they needed to leave to attend to other commitments. I was disappointed with this experience and felt frustrated with the service provided.
Ayub S.
7 years ago
Excellent!
Quick service with friendly staff but cramped waiting area
The service was efficient and the team were welcoming, though additional seating would be beneficial.
Nuran D.
7 years ago
Bad!
Reception took nine days to return voicemail
I have been attempting to contact the reception team for over a week, during which time I left multiple voicemails. They eventually called me back today. The person who answered was from the reception desk, and I found their manner to be quite dismissive and unhelpful. They told me not to leave further voicemails and suggested that I should not be calling so frequently, as someone would get back to me eventually. However, it took nine days and five voicemails before I received a response. I have noticed that other patients seem to share similar concerns about the reception staff, whereas the clinical team itself does not appear to be an issue. The interaction has left a lasting impression on me, and I am frustrated by what felt like a condescending attitude towards someone simply seeking information. I feel that the reception staff should approach their role with more patience and respect for patients who require assistance.
Vasil T.
7 years ago
Bad!
Reception staff didn't acknowledge our arrival
The clinical staff provided excellent care, however the reception team across the practice was disappointing. The wait to be seen was considerably longer than expected, as it appeared there was a communication issue regarding patient arrivals being conveyed to the clinical team. The reception experience fell short of expectations.
Semir I.
7 years ago
Bad!
Receptionist rudeness overshadows decent medical care
The clinical staff are adequate, however the reception team demonstrated poor interpersonal skills. The overall customer service experience was unsatisfactory.
Costanza B.
7 years ago
Bad!
Unhelpful staff made me feel unheard
About as useful as discussing your health concerns with a retail worker, except the retail worker would treat you with courtesy, whereas the staff here did not.
Wesley B.
7 years ago
Bad!
Reception staff ignored phones during personal conversations
The clinical staff are generally adequate, but the front desk team has been problematic. Both my spouse and I have encountered dismissive and hurried behaviour from reception personnel, including instances of inattention to people waiting at the desk and prolonged delays in answering phones while staff engaged in personal discussions. We have found it challenging to arrange appointments via telephone, and when errors occur in bookings or communication, responsibility is quickly directed toward patients rather than acknowledged as a mistake. Specific staff members at reception have struggled to interact with people in a courteous manner. While the doctors are mostly professional and competent, a couple have displayed concerning conduct on separate occasions. One doctor proceeded with a physical examination of my spouse in sensitive areas without prior explanation or clarification of how this related to the presenting symptoms. Another doctor showed a lack of compassion toward my spouse following a pregnancy loss, appearing more focused on validating their own diagnosis than providing appropriate emotional support during a difficult time. Since transferring to another practice, we have noticed a marked improvement in the standard of care received.
Alex C.
7 years ago
Bad!
Long wait on the phone queue
The phone service was disappointing, as I waited considerably longer than expected before my call was picked up, despite being first in the queue.
Jacqueline O.
7 years ago
Excellent!
Efficient practice with helpful on-site pharmacist
Very efficient practice. Great doctors and staff, as well as an on-site pharmacist who is excellent. My whole family have been registered here for over 30 years. All the clinical staff are extremely competent.
Gabriela G.
7 years ago
Excellent!
Friendly reception made the visit pleasant
Excellent experience with a welcoming and approachable team.