Patient Experience Summary

Feedback on this practice reflects a mixed experience with significant variation in service quality. Positive feedback highlights courteous and professional staff, clinical competence, modern facilities, and responsive care from individual clinicians who demonstrate genuine empathy. However, substantial concerns emerge around appointment access, with patients reporting extreme difficulty securing appointments and lengthy waiting periods. Reception experience presents a consistent challenge, with multiple reports of unwelcoming or dismissive interactions. Communication delays are widespread, particularly regarding test results and callback systems, with some patients experiencing week-long waits for responses. The online booking system generates frustration due to complexity and lack of responsiveness, while administrative inefficiencies affect continuity of care. Several patients note inconsistent standards between clinicians and describe the practice as disorganised, with a focus on procedural compliance over patient reassurance.

Since the practice's relocation, accessibility has notably declined. Patients report difficulty obtaining face-to-face appointments and describe the shift to online-only communication as creating barriers to timely care. The callback system operates with vague timeframes, and missed calls result in extended delays. Some patients have sought alternative providers due to these access difficulties, whilst others have resorted to accident and emergency services when unable to reach the practice. A small number of patients report excellent experiences with specific clinicians and appreciate the modern premises, but these positive interactions are frequently overshadowed by frustration with booking systems and reception responsiveness.

The practice appears to operate with resource constraints that impact service delivery. While clinical staff capability is generally acknowledged, organisational inefficiencies and communication gaps between departments create patient frustration. Concerns about record-keeping accuracy and gaps between documented procedures and actual implementation have been raised. The combination of appointment access challenges, reception experience issues, and communication delays suggests systemic operational difficulties that require attention to restore patient confidence in the service.

Appointment

38.91 %
Poor

Reception

45.32 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

58.76 %
Average

Respect

48.64 %
Poor

Seen on time

42.27 %
Poor

Filter

JM

James M. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Great!

Efficient phone consultations and helpful staff

Positive experience with helpful team members who are capable of assisting with various needs when given adequate time. The premises and amenities are excellent. While in-person appointments may involve extended waiting periods, remote consultations are available within a few days and medications can be obtained through electronic means. Overall, this practice comes highly recommended. ✔️

More Info
AB

Alex B. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception staff dismissive about missing test results

The service here has been disappointing. There have been ongoing issues with communication regarding test results, with the practice suggesting that another healthcare provider hasn't sent information when I have evidence that they have. The approach feels pushy and dismissive of patient concerns. It appears the practice is not delivering the level of care and attention that patients deserve for the funding they receive. The customer service experience has been poor, and I would recommend looking elsewhere for your healthcare needs. I believe the practice's standards fall short of what should be expected from an NHS provider.

More Info
M.

Marc .. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Impossible to book an appointment here

It is extremely difficult to obtain an appointment at this practice. This reflects broader challenges currently facing the NHS.

More Info
EL

Eric L. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Poor communication let us down badly

The practice appeared to lack effective organisation, with notable gaps in both internal and external communication. A visit to this facility provides insight into how inefficiencies can develop within healthcare services, affecting both resources and patient time.

More Info
CC

Candisia C. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Reception staff attitude makes appointments difficult

The practice was previously located elsewhere under a different name before relocating to its current address. One particular clinician stands out as notably competent, professional, and empathetic. However, the experience with other clinicians has been inconsistent, with a tendency toward offering personal viewpoints rather than objective clinical guidance. The reception team's manner has come across as unnecessarily abrupt and unwelcoming. EXAMPLE 1: During an appointment regarding mental health concerns, I was told that my ability to attend the appointment suggested there were no significant issues, and that anger management might be more appropriate. This feedback felt dismissive given a documented history of ongoing mental health difficulties spanning over a decade. I was concerned about how such an interaction could affect someone in a more vulnerable state. EXAMPLE 2: Before planning to have children, I expressed concerns about fertility. I was advised that no investigations or support could be offered. A subsequent appointment with the aforementioned clinician resulted in a more supportive approach, with appropriate investigations arranged to check for any underlying issues. EXAMPLE 3: When experiencing a respiratory infection during pregnancy, I was prescribed an antibiotic at a dosage and duration that seemed unusually high. Upon attending hospital, staff expressed concern about the prescription and indicated that following such guidance could have posed risks to the pregnancy.

More Info
SC

Sam C. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Friendly staff who communicate clearly

I have consistently received good service and all staff members have communicated clearly. It is challenging enough for GP practices to recruit personnel without facing unjustified criticism.

More Info
SG

Samantha G. Google 9 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Always takes time to listen

What can I say? Very good and very helpful, always there for me and my family whenever we need assistance with anything. Best GP surgery I've been to. I'm very happy with everyone there as they always make time to see you.💯

More Info
SB

Stuart B. Google 9 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Staff gave conflicting advice during registration screening

I have found this practice to be disappointing. After three months, I am already considering alternatives. There appears to be a lack of coordination between different staff members at this practice. For example, one clinician indicated my health readings were within normal range, whilst another suggested they were elevated. This created confusion about whose assessment to rely upon. I sought medical advice for a specific reason. The situation was complicated by a mandatory screening during my initial registration. This has left me feeling more anxious than I was previously. I had hoped the registration process would be straightforward and reassuring. I should also mention that my experience during the initial registration was frustrating. I encountered difficulties with administrative procedures and had concerns about how my documentation was handled. The overall impression I have is that the practice feels disorganised. My sense is that the focus may be more on procedural compliance than on patient care and reassurance.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient feedback

Track improvement over time

Export evidence for CQC inspections

Claim your profile
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Verified GP
  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 020 87618070
  • The Old Dairy Health Ctr 19B Croxted Road West Dulwich London SE21 8SZ

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback on this practice reflects a mixed experience with significant variation in service quality. Positive feedback highlights courteous and professional staff, clinical competence, modern facilities, and responsive care from individual clinicians who demonstrate genuine empathy. However, substantial concerns emerge around appointment access, with patients reporting extreme difficulty securing appointments and lengthy waiting periods. Reception experience presents a consistent challenge, with multiple reports of unwelcoming or dismissive interactions. Communication delays are widespread, particularly regarding test results and callback systems, with some patients experiencing week-long waits for responses. The online booking system generates frustration due to complexity and lack of responsiveness, while administrative inefficiencies affect continuity of care. Several patients note inconsistent standards between clinicians and describe the practice as disorganised, with a focus on procedural compliance over patient reassurance.

Since the practice's relocation, accessibility has notably declined. Patients report difficulty obtaining face-to-face appointments and describe the shift to online-only communication as creating barriers to timely care. The callback system operates with vague timeframes, and missed calls result in extended delays. Some patients have sought alternative providers due to these access difficulties, whilst others have resorted to accident and emergency services when unable to reach the practice. A small number of patients report excellent experiences with specific clinicians and appreciate the modern premises, but these positive interactions are frequently overshadowed by frustration with booking systems and reception responsiveness.

The practice appears to operate with resource constraints that impact service delivery. While clinical staff capability is generally acknowledged, organisational inefficiencies and communication gaps between departments create patient frustration. Concerns about record-keeping accuracy and gaps between documented procedures and actual implementation have been raised. The combination of appointment access challenges, reception experience issues, and communication delays suggests systemic operational difficulties that require attention to restore patient confidence in the service.

Appointment

38.91 %
Poor

Reception

45.32 %
Poor

Cleanliness

72.50 %
Great

Care

58.76 %
Average

Respect

48.64 %
Poor

Seen on time

42.27 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating