Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience with significant access challenges alongside strong clinical care. The most consistent concern across reviews is difficulty reaching the practice by telephone, with patients reporting lengthy waits, unanswered calls, and disconnections. Appointment availability remains problematic, with extended waiting periods and complex booking processes. The new online appointment system has generated particular frustration, with patients describing it as unnecessarily complicated, featuring intrusive questionnaires and limited flexibility. Reception staff interactions show considerable variation, with some patients praising courtesy and helpfulness whilst others report dismissive or unwelcoming behaviour.

Clinical care quality is consistently praised, with patients describing clinicians as professional, thorough, and genuinely concerned about their wellbeing. Communication regarding test outcomes and follow-up care is generally viewed positively. However, access barriers mean patients struggle to reach these services, creating a disconnect between the quality of clinical provision and the ease of obtaining it. Some patients have transferred to alternative practices due to access frustrations, despite valuing the clinical team.

The practice appears to be operating at high capacity, which may explain some access difficulties. Recent system changes have created mixed results, with some patients noting improvements in callback systems and online repeat medication requests, whilst others find the new appointment process creates additional barriers to care. The variation in patient experience suggests inconsistency in how different staff members handle patient interactions and requests.

Appointment

38.92 %
Poor

Reception

45.67 %
Poor

Cleanliness

75.00 %
Great

Care

72.89 %
Great

Respect

48.56 %
Poor

Seen on time

42.13 %
Poor

Filter

BP

Barbara P. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Impossible to reach the practice by phone

It is frustrating to experience difficulty reaching the practice, with phone calls frequently going unanswered or being declined, and there being no option to leave a voicemail. Additionally, the manner of the reception staff was disappointing.

More Info
SM

S M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

New management hasn't improved things much

The new management has provided a disappointing service experience. I am not satisfied with the current standard of care. There is considerable room for improvement in how the practice operates.

More Info
JH

Janey H. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Reception and doctors genuinely care about patients

An absolutely wonderful practice, from the moment you arrive at reception through to your consultation. The entire team demonstrates genuine care and concern for their patients' wellbeing.

More Info
EJ

Eraine J. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Great!

Reception phones are much easier to reach now

I must acknowledge the positive changes that have taken place. The reception team has shown considerable improvement over recent months. I have experienced no significant difficulties when attempting to make contact. I appreciate the efforts made during these challenging times.

More Info
DS

Desiree S. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Hard to reach reception and unfriendly staff

The reception team is frequently unavailable, requiring lengthy waits of at least half an hour before someone responds. When contact is eventually made, the interactions tend to lack warmth and friendliness.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01892 546422
  • Clanricarde Mc, Abbey Crt 7-15 St Johns Road Tunbridge Wells Kent TN4 9TF

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience with significant access challenges alongside strong clinical care. The most consistent concern across reviews is difficulty reaching the practice by telephone, with patients reporting lengthy waits, unanswered calls, and disconnections. Appointment availability remains problematic, with extended waiting periods and complex booking processes. The new online appointment system has generated particular frustration, with patients describing it as unnecessarily complicated, featuring intrusive questionnaires and limited flexibility. Reception staff interactions show considerable variation, with some patients praising courtesy and helpfulness whilst others report dismissive or unwelcoming behaviour.

Clinical care quality is consistently praised, with patients describing clinicians as professional, thorough, and genuinely concerned about their wellbeing. Communication regarding test outcomes and follow-up care is generally viewed positively. However, access barriers mean patients struggle to reach these services, creating a disconnect between the quality of clinical provision and the ease of obtaining it. Some patients have transferred to alternative practices due to access frustrations, despite valuing the clinical team.

The practice appears to be operating at high capacity, which may explain some access difficulties. Recent system changes have created mixed results, with some patients noting improvements in callback systems and online repeat medication requests, whilst others find the new appointment process creates additional barriers to care. The variation in patient experience suggests inconsistency in how different staff members handle patient interactions and requests.

Appointment

38.92 %
Poor

Reception

45.67 %
Poor

Cleanliness

75.00 %
Great

Care

72.89 %
Great

Respect

48.56 %
Poor

Seen on time

42.13 %
Poor
Filter

Order By

Rating