Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reveals significant challenges with appointment access and booking systems, with patients reporting extensive waiting times, phone line failures, and difficulties securing consultations. Reception experience emerges as a key concern, with multiple accounts of discourteous interactions, dismissive attitudes, and poor responsiveness to patient needs. Communication breakdowns are evident across administrative processes, including delayed test results, lost referrals, and inadequate follow-up on scheduled callbacks. However, clinical care receives consistent praise, with patients highlighting compassionate doctors, attentive nursing staff, and professional physiotherapy services. The contrast between positive clinical experiences and negative administrative interactions suggests operational inefficiencies rather than care quality issues.

Patients describe the booking process as particularly problematic, with some unable to reach the practice by phone and others facing month-long waits for appointments. Several reviews mention phone system failures where calls disconnect after lengthy hold periods. Administrative errors including misplaced documentation, incorrect registration records, and scheduling conflicts have compounded patient frustration. Despite these systemic issues, individual healthcare professionals receive recognition for their dedication and clinical competence, with several patients expressing gratitude for thorough examinations and genuine care.

The practice appears to struggle with capacity and coordination between departments. While some patients report positive experiences with prompt medication delivery and efficient physiotherapy appointments, others describe a disorganised approach to scheduling and communication that leaves them feeling unsupported. The feedback suggests that improving administrative processes, phone accessibility, and interdepartmental coordination would significantly enhance the overall patient experience.

Appointment

22.10 %
Bad

Reception

28.90 %
Bad

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

58.75 %
Average

Respect

31.20 %
Bad

Seen on time

25.85 %
Bad

Filter

AB

Amanda B. Google 3 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Terrible service at my local clinic

Utterly useless! This place was fantastic in the past, but now it's a total disaster!

More Info
TT

Tracy T. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Loyal customer for a quarter century

I've been a loyal customer of Western Elms for a quarter of a century, and they've consistently provided exceptional service. Whenever I need assistance, their staff is always friendly and accommodating.

More Info
EM

Emoke M. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Months of frustration with referral request

Absolutely appalling customer service! My partner has been attempting to obtain a referral document for his personal medical specialist, a billable process that is crucial for his care. Despite three months of persistent efforts, he remains without the necessary referral and has only been offered another pointless telephone consultation. He urgently requires an in-person medical assessment to properly address his health issue, not another round of futile phone recommendations! Although his medical situation may not be classified as an emergency, it could potentially have serious consequences!

More Info
QW

Q W. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Worst purchase of my life

Complete and total garbage.

More Info
EE

Ellie E. Google 4 years ago

Rating

Bad!

frustrating half hour call queue

Like every medical practice in Reading, Western Elms is completely overwhelmed and incapable of managing its patient load. I've wasted 3 hours on the phone over the past month just trying to obtain a single test result related to my spine. Each time I contact them, I'm assured a manager will access the system and follow up with my results, but this never materializes. I'm finally writing a review because today I endured 35 minutes in a call queue only to be abruptly disconnected without speaking to anyone. I'm utterly exasperated. Additionally, a locum GP who consulted with me remotely requested a referral, but when I called the following week to inquire about my test result, I discovered the referral was never processed. What an absolute disaster. It's exhausting. Spending half an hour on hold just to achieve nothing is infuriating. I'm unable to register with another practice because everywhere is at full capacity, leaving me trapped with this deplorable service. If you have any opportunity to register elsewhere, I strongly advise you to do so.

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 0118 9590257
  • Western Elms Surgery 317 Oxford Road Reading Berkshire RG30 1AT

Patient Experience Summary

Feedback reveals significant challenges with appointment access and booking systems, with patients reporting extensive waiting times, phone line failures, and difficulties securing consultations. Reception experience emerges as a key concern, with multiple accounts of discourteous interactions, dismissive attitudes, and poor responsiveness to patient needs. Communication breakdowns are evident across administrative processes, including delayed test results, lost referrals, and inadequate follow-up on scheduled callbacks. However, clinical care receives consistent praise, with patients highlighting compassionate doctors, attentive nursing staff, and professional physiotherapy services. The contrast between positive clinical experiences and negative administrative interactions suggests operational inefficiencies rather than care quality issues.

Patients describe the booking process as particularly problematic, with some unable to reach the practice by phone and others facing month-long waits for appointments. Several reviews mention phone system failures where calls disconnect after lengthy hold periods. Administrative errors including misplaced documentation, incorrect registration records, and scheduling conflicts have compounded patient frustration. Despite these systemic issues, individual healthcare professionals receive recognition for their dedication and clinical competence, with several patients expressing gratitude for thorough examinations and genuine care.

The practice appears to struggle with capacity and coordination between departments. While some patients report positive experiences with prompt medication delivery and efficient physiotherapy appointments, others describe a disorganised approach to scheduling and communication that leaves them feeling unsupported. The feedback suggests that improving administrative processes, phone accessibility, and interdepartmental coordination would significantly enhance the overall patient experience.

Appointment

22.10 %
Bad

Reception

28.90 %
Bad

Cleanliness

65.00 %
Great

Care

58.75 %
Average

Respect

31.20 %
Bad

Seen on time

25.85 %
Bad
Filter

Order By

Rating