Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience across the practice. Clinical staff are consistently praised for their professionalism, approachability, and genuine engagement with patient concerns. Many patients report positive experiences with appointment availability and the quality of clinical care provided. However, significant operational challenges emerge across multiple reviews, particularly regarding telephone access, which patients describe as persistently difficult to reach. Reception experience presents a notable area of concern, with several patients reporting staff interactions that felt dismissive, abrupt, or unwelcoming, creating a stark contrast with the quality of clinical care.

Continuity of care and follow-up processes show inconsistency across the practice. Some patients experienced lengthy waits for specialist referrals or inadequate communication about test results and next steps. Appointment procedures have also drawn criticism, with some patients finding the booking system inflexible or encountering extended waiting times. A few patients noted that consultations felt rushed, limiting opportunity for meaningful discussion about their health concerns.

Where the practice excels, patients highlight the welcoming atmosphere, efficient organisation, and the responsiveness of clinical staff who take time to listen and explain treatment options. The contrast between positive clinical experiences and operational or reception-related frustrations suggests that improvements in telephone accessibility, reception team training, and care coordination could significantly enhance overall patient satisfaction.

Appointment

59.87 %
Average

Reception

54.32 %
Average

Cleanliness

72.15 %
Great

Care

68.90 %
Great

Respect

58.76 %
Average

Seen on time

55.43 %
Average

Filter

MI

Me I. Google 7 years ago

Rating

Bad!

Inconsistent care and dismissive attitudes

I have visited this practice on two occasions. During one appointment, I felt the clinician was dismissive of my concerns and their demeanor seemed unprofessional. On another visit, I found the clinician to be abrupt and unhelpful, which left me feeling frustrated. Overall, my experiences have not been positive, and I would recommend exploring other options.

More Info
AS

Amy S. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Poor!

Inconsistent GP care despite attentive nursing staff

The nursing staff at this practice are excellent and I have no complaints about them whatsoever. The doctors, however, can be quite variable in their approach. Some have come across as dismissive towards concerns and reluctant to take action. I experienced a lengthy wait of several years before receiving a referral to a specialist for ongoing issues that the practice was unable to identify or effectively manage. The standard of care appears inconsistent, and there seems to be a lack of awareness regarding patient histories, which is surprising given that medical records should be readily available. On several occasions, the medical staff have not appeared particularly engaged or invested in addressing my concerns.

More Info
KF

Kelly F. Google 8 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Doctors who actually listen to you

Excellent medical professionals

More Info
BR

Billie R. Google 10 years ago

Rating

Excellent!

Doctors who actually listen to you

Excellent medical professionals

More Info

For practice staff

Respond to patient reviews

Monitor satisfaction trends

Generate CQC evidence reports

Claim & Manage Profile
Trusted by GP practices across the UK
Practice Response Rate
0.00%

Shows how often this practice responds to patient reviews and feedback.

About the GP

  • Accepts all feedback, both positive and negative.

Contact Information

  • 01482 335300
  • Wolseley Medical Centre Londesborough Street Hull HU3 1DS

Patient Experience Summary

Patient feedback reveals a mixed experience across the practice. Clinical staff are consistently praised for their professionalism, approachability, and genuine engagement with patient concerns. Many patients report positive experiences with appointment availability and the quality of clinical care provided. However, significant operational challenges emerge across multiple reviews, particularly regarding telephone access, which patients describe as persistently difficult to reach. Reception experience presents a notable area of concern, with several patients reporting staff interactions that felt dismissive, abrupt, or unwelcoming, creating a stark contrast with the quality of clinical care.

Continuity of care and follow-up processes show inconsistency across the practice. Some patients experienced lengthy waits for specialist referrals or inadequate communication about test results and next steps. Appointment procedures have also drawn criticism, with some patients finding the booking system inflexible or encountering extended waiting times. A few patients noted that consultations felt rushed, limiting opportunity for meaningful discussion about their health concerns.

Where the practice excels, patients highlight the welcoming atmosphere, efficient organisation, and the responsiveness of clinical staff who take time to listen and explain treatment options. The contrast between positive clinical experiences and operational or reception-related frustrations suggests that improvements in telephone accessibility, reception team training, and care coordination could significantly enhance overall patient satisfaction.

Appointment

59.87 %
Average

Reception

54.32 %
Average

Cleanliness

72.15 %
Great

Care

68.90 %
Great

Respect

58.76 %
Average

Seen on time

55.43 %
Average
Filter

Order By

Rating