The Harvey Practice
GG
Gabi G. 3 years ago • From Google
Bad
I've encountered claims about distant healing abilities, but I never anticipated such practices at the NHS. At The Harveys Practise, it seems diagnosing patients without direct interaction is standard procedure. For over seven months, I sought assistance to address my inflamed tissues, joint issues, and persistent pain. My initial consultation was with a young, eager GP who appeared inexperienced. While I understand everyone starts somewhere and didn't object when she consulted a more senior colleague, I was taken aback that no experienced doctor returned to examine me or support their junior colleague. As my condition deteriorated, I requested a consultation with a more seasoned GP, hoping for a clear diagnosis and treatment strategy. I visited the practice three times, yet no senior medical professional ever assessed my condition. During one particularly challenging moment, when my hand was nearly immobilized and pain was intense, a young GP "diagnosed" me by referencing a laminated reference sheet. Once again, no senior physician intervened or personally examined me. Evidently, Harvey's staff seem to rely on mysterious diagnostic methods, as none of the GPs reviewed my medical history before appointments or consultations. Dutifully, I repeatedly recounted my symptoms, consuming precious consultation time. Traditional healers would spend hours performing rituals to help patients. At Harvey's Practise, their version of healing is remarkably expedited. I witnessed a stressed GP chasing a senior doctor in the hallway, who provided a two-minute "diagnosis" without entering the examination room. After seven months of being shuffled between various GPs, I ultimately sought help at a private clinic. Within 10 minutes of a comprehensive examination and targeted questioning, a professional provided a precise diagnosis and treatment plan. Most distressingly, the practice's doctors casually mentioned potentially life-altering, incurable conditions without thoroughly examining me. These repeated, futile interactions ultimately triggered severe anxiety. The practice offers no guidance on obtaining test results, let alone ensuring a doctor reviews them with the patient or schedules a follow-up. One receptionist even dismissively responded, "Why do you need to talk to your doctor? Your tests are fine." Fortunately, my condition was not terminal, and I eventually received care from compassionate, competent professionals. However, I shudder to think what might happen to someone developing a preventable but potentially fatal illness. Seven months is an unacceptably long time to wait.
Sarah T.